Question about the Weiner-Khinchin theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrMeister
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around attempts to apply the Wiener-Khinchin theorem and the Fourier transform to solve a problem involving decomposition coefficients. The original poster struggled with integrating limits and did not find success in their initial approach. They later resolved the problem but noted that they did not use the relation for z(t) in their solution. They seek clarification on whether the relation for z(t) is implicitly included in the solution and express confusion about the expectations for sharing derivations in the forum. Ultimately, the conversation highlights challenges in understanding the theorem's application and the sharing of problem-solving processes.
mrMeister
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
The question is attached below.
Relevant Equations
correlation equations
Wiener-Khinchin theorem
My try:

I tried to take the expression for the decomposition coefficients and put it into the equation that I had to prove.
Then, I tried to work with the integral limits in order to get into Wiener-Khinchin theorem or maybe Fourier transform of delta function but I didn't see any success in those tries.

It would be nice to get a new point of view.

Thank you.

EDIT: I did solve this problem eventually, but I did not use the relation for z(t) - how is that?
1584726208261.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please shoe your work and also where you got stuck.
 
Watch my comment - I have solved this question but without the use of the relation for z(t).
I wanted to ask if it is hidden somewhere throughout the solution.
 
So you want someone to tell you if you assumed anything in a derivation that you refuse to share? I don’t think you understand how PF works.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top