Question about work energy theorem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a homework question regarding the work-energy theorem, specifically how to determine the maximum speed at an angle of 120 degrees without using vector integration. The participant expresses difficulty in solving part 5 of the problem and considers the integration approach too complex for a four-mark question. Another contributor suggests that writing the integral while considering a constant force can simplify the process. This indicates that there may be a more straightforward method to find the maximum speed using the work-energy principle. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the challenges of applying theoretical concepts to practical problems in physics.
Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


36.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to do part 5, I know the point of maximum speed is at an angle of 120 degrees because the work starts to be negative, but how do I find of the maximum speed at that point without using vector integration? (I tried to integrate from theta = 0 to 2 pi /3 but I think it is a bit complicated for a 4 marks question.)
 

Attachments

  • 36.png
    36.png
    55 KB · Views: 1,157
Physics news on Phys.org
Clara Chung said:
how do I find of the maximum speed at that point without using vector integration
Nevertheless, if you write the integral and bear in mind that ##\vec F## is constant you may find it is quite easy.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top