Question on a sinodal charge distribution regarding retarded potential.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the retarded scalar potential V at the origin from a rotating plastic circular ring with a specific line charge density. The charge density is defined as λ = λ₀ |sin(θ/2)|, where θ is related to the angular position and time through the equation θ = φ - ωt_r. The main query concerns the integration limits for φ and θ, as the book claims both range from 0 to 2π, but a substitution seems to alter these limits. The user initially sought clarification on this point but later indicated they resolved their original question and posed a new one. The thread highlights the complexities of integrating over time-varying charge distributions in electromagnetic theory.
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294
The example is about finding the retarded scalar potential V at the origin from a plastic circular ring on xy plane center at origin spining at constant angular velocity \omega with line charge density: \lambda = \lambda_0\left | sin \left (\frac {\theta}{2}\right ) \right |[/itex]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> For finding retarded potential at the origin,<br /> \hbox { Let }\; \theta = \phi - \omega t_r<br /> <br /> \lambda_{(\phi,t_r)} = \lambda_0\left | sin \left (\frac {\theta}{2}\right ) \right | = \lambda_0\left | sin \left (\frac {\phi -\omega t_r}{2}\right ) \right |<br /> <br /> Where V_{(\vec r,t)} = \frac 1 {4\pi \epsilon_0}\int \frac {\lambda_{(\phi,t_r)}}{a} dl&amp;#039; = \frac {\lambda_0} {4\pi \epsilon_0}\int_0^{2\pi} \frac {\left |sin \left (\frac {\phi - \omega t_r}{2}\right ) \right | }{a} ad\phi = \frac {\lambda_0} {4\pi \epsilon_0}\int_0^{2\pi} \left |sin \left (\frac {\theta}{2}\right ) \right | d\theta<br /> <br /> Notice the limit of the two integration still the same? My question is the book claim both \phi \;\hbox { and }\; \theta are 0 to 2\pi. But if you do the convensional substitution:<br /> <br /> \phi = 0 \Rightarrow \theta =-\frac { \omega t_r}{2} \hbox { and } \;\phi = 2\pi \Rightarrow \theta = 2\pi-\frac { \omega t_r}{2}<br /> <br /> This will change the limit. Please explain why I can do that.<br /> <br /> Thanks<br /> <br /> Alan
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I figure out my original question. But I have a totally different question. I modified the original post #1. Please take a look and help me.

Thanks

Alan
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top