Question on Black Hole Metrics

  • Thread starter Thread starter skippy1729
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
skippy1729
Are there any exact solutions known for a black hole in a universe which is NOT asymptotically flat?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes and no. Technically, the notion of a black hole doesn't make sense in a non AF spacetime. An event horizon is defined as the boundary of the past of future null infinity, but there's no such thing as null infinity if the spacetime is not AF. (Intuitively, a black hole is a region of spacetime from which nothing can escape--but if there's no infinity, what does "escape" even mean?)

However, there are some solutions, like Schwarzschild deSitter, which most people would say represent "a black hole in a non-AF universe".
 
Sam Gralla said:
An event horizon is defined as the boundary of the past of future null infinity, but there's no such thing as null infinity if the spacetime is not AF. (Intuitively, a black hole is a region of spacetime from which nothing can escape--but if there's no infinity, what does "escape" even mean?)
So you think radially rising light has some kind of apogee?
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top