Question on circular motion and Newton's laws

AI Thread Summary
When twirling a rubber stopper attached to a string, the action and reaction forces include the tension force in the string and the force exerted by the hand on the string. Circular motion exemplifies Newton's first law, as the rubber stopper maintains its motion unless acted upon by an external force. The discussion clarifies that centrifugal force is not a real force, aligning with Newton's third law, which states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The tension force in the string corresponds to the force exerted by the hand, illustrating the interaction between the two. Understanding these force pairs is essential for grasping the principles of circular motion and Newton's laws.
excel000
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
1. What are the action/reaction forces when twirling a rubber stopper attached to a string? How does circular motion illustrate Newton's first law?



2. F=ma



3. I thought about centripetal and centrifugal, but my teacher said centrifugal force isn't a real force.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your teacher of course is correct. When you talk of 'action/reaction' forces, you're talking usually about Newton's 3rd Law 'force pairs', whereby if A exerts a force on B, then B exerts a force on A that is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to it. Does that help?
 
yea, but i can only think of the tension force, i can't think of the opposite to that. how about the force applied by the hand and the tension force?
 
excel000 said:
yea, but i can only think of the tension force, i can't think of the opposite to that. how about the force applied by the hand and the tension force?
Yes, that's one of them. If the hand pulls on the string creating a force in the string, then what can you say about the force of the string on the hand? What about the stopper/string force pair?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top