Question on conservation of momentum

AI Thread Summary
When jumping on a weighing scale, the initial weight reading is higher due to the force required to decelerate the body and counteract gravity, resulting in a temporary increase in "apparent weight." This phenomenon occurs because the scale measures both the force of deceleration and the gravitational force acting on the body. In terms of collisions, the outcome depends on the materials of the colliding objects; for example, beach balls and billiard balls will behave differently due to energy loss from deformation. Assuming a perfectly elastic collision, it is possible to calculate the post-collision velocities of the balls using their mass and initial velocities. Understanding these concepts highlights the relationship between force, momentum, and energy conservation in physics.
rishch
Messages
106
Reaction score
1
When you jump on a weighing scale the instant that you hit you're weight is higher than it would be if you were to gently step on on.Can someone give me a proper answer? I think its somehow related to conservation of momentum but i can't think of a proper answer.

Also,suppose you two balls and you know the mass and the velocity of both and then they both collide then is there any way of knowing there velocities after the collision?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The force on the weight from your body is higher initially, because your body decelerates to zero speed. The weight measures the force of deceleration + gravity, and shows higher value till center of mass of the system has stopped, and deceleration has ceased.

To second: Energy is preserved, kinetic energy is constant, Forces are equal in contact
 
1> Is this right-the scale shows more because the scale must provide the force to decelerate your body and also to negate the effect of gravity.
2>I didn't understand your answer.
 
The scale measures the force of gravity pulling your body down towards the Earth. If you are falling onto it then there is more force against the scale than if you were just standing on it. This is called "apparent weight" and is the weight measured if you were accelerating in something such as an elevator. This contrasts with a purely "gravitational weight" which is only measured as the force of gravity on your mass.

To answer your 2nd question you would need to know what the balls were made of. Two beach balls would lose much more energy from the collision than two billiard balls would since the beach balls deform much more and have lots of air.

Assuming a "perfect" elastic collision yes, you could calculate the velocities and other properties of the balls after the collision.
 
rishch said:
1> Is this right-the scale shows more because the scale must provide the force to decelerate your body and also to negate the effect of gravity.
Yes.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top