Hello guys. I need to prove the following:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Let [itex]X=(\mathbb{R}\times \{0\})\cup(\mathbb{R}\times\{1\})[/itex] and [itex](x,0)\sim (x,1)[/itex] when [itex]x \neq 0[/itex]. Prove that [itex]L:=X/\sim[/itex] is a topological space locally homeomorphic to [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex], but is not Hausdorff.

In order to prove that [itex]L[/itex] is homeomorphic to [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex], all I need to do is show a continuous function [itex]f:L\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}[/itex] such that [itex]f[/itex] is invertible and [itex]f^{-1}[/itex] is also continuous, right?

I am new at this, so I am a bit confused on the Hausdorff part. A topological space isnotHausdorff if there is a pair of distinct points [itex]x,\,y[/itex] such that there are open sets [itex]U[/itex] and [itex]V[/itex] so that [itex]x\in U[/itex] and [itex]y\in V[/itex], but [itex]U\cap V \neq \emptyset[/itex], right?

If what I stated above is true, then I need to find two open sets, one containing the point [itex](0,0)[/itex] and the other containing [itex](0,1)[/itex], such that their intersection is not empty? Will that be sufficient?

Thx for the help and sorry for my english.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Question on homeomorfism

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**