Question on Hydrates and Reactions

  • Thread starter Thread starter rosyposy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions
AI Thread Summary
When reacting copper (II) chloride dihydrate with aluminum, the correct representation of the compound depends on the context of the reaction. If the copper (II) chloride is dissolved in water, it is typically represented as CuCl2·2H2O to indicate its hydrated form, which adds mass to the molecule. This is important for accurate stoichiometric calculations, particularly when determining the concentration of the original solution based on the mass of copper retrieved from the reaction. While some sources may omit the water of hydration when writing the equation, including it is essential for clarity and accuracy in specific scenarios. The form of copper chloride used—either the anhydrous yellowish-brown powder or the green crystalline dihydrate—also influences how the reaction is presented. Ultimately, the choice of representation should align with the goals of the analysis and the specific details of the experiment.
rosyposy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey! I am currently working on a project where I have to react copper (II) chloride dihydrate (dissolved in water) and aluminum. When writing the equation and the ionic equation for this, would you include the dihydrate in the formula since it’s dissolved in water and no longer in its crystalline form or would you still write it as CuCl2.2H2O, can you also provide an explanation for the correct way to write since I am really confused as some sites write it with the H2O and some don’t. Thank you!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The water of hydration - .2H20 - adds mass to the molecule. So, if are going to get a dry weight to assay some reaction in a solution you have to include it. Is that what you are asking? You can write the reaction ignoring the extra mass but I do not see any immediate benefit other than teaching an introduction.
Practical aspect is what you have dictates what you do:
Copper chloride appears as a yellowish-brown powder (the anhydrous form) or a green crystalline solid (the dihydrate). The green stuff is usually what you have. If have the brown stuff you would measure the mass of copper chloride with no water to worry about.
 
Last edited:
Hey, so I am only weighing the copper retrieved from the reaction to find the concentration of the original solution using stoichiometry, but I also need to write the formula for the whole reaction with states so I was just asking if I would write the copper (II) chloride dihydrate as a dihydrate since it is dissolved in water and I’m not sure if you are supposed to write dihydrates as aqueous since they exist in crystalline form.
 
There is no simple yes/no answer to your question.

A lot depends and what you want to show. Every way of writing the reaction has its own applications and makes sense in different contexts.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top