Question on movement speeds relative to an observer.

Ralphonsicus
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Say I am at point X. My friend, Gary, is 20m from X, and my friend Liam is 40m from X. Gary is traveling at 5 metres per second in a circle around me, remaining 20m from X. What speed must Liam travel at to appear, to me, to be traveling at the same speed as Gary? Is it 10 metres per second or is it more complicated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
5 metres per second.
 
ghwellsjr said:
5 metres per second.

Maybe I phrased it wrong. Imagine that Liam wants to stay hidden behind Gary as Gary walks, while Liam himself remains 40m away, and Gary 20m?
 
10 metres per second. But Liam will have to start walking a little before Gary in order to stay hidden.
 
It's 10m/s, Liam is going to have to run as fast as Usain Bolt.

Gary's circle of radius 20m has a circumference of pi*D, where D is diameter = 2*20m
So, Gary's circle is about 125.6m around. If he walks 5m of that in one second, then the time around is 125.6m/(5m/1s)=125.6ms/5m=25.12s
Liam would need to walk his circle in the same time as 25.12s
The circumference of Liam's circle is pi*D where D is 2*40m, or 251.2m
Liam needs to go 251.2m in 25.12s, so 251.2m/25.12s=10m/s

George, unless Gary is very thin and Liam pretty fat (for a thought experiment both might be considered identical sized spheres), Liam should subtend a small enough area behind Gary that his image will stay well within that subtended by Gary with plenty of overlap to account for the delaying of his light image, at least at these distances.
But I guess the next step you are anticipating would be to determine the sizes of Gary and Liam, and the respective distances at which the geometrical subtended overlap is overcome by the delay in light. That calculation would be complex because the segment of arc subtended by Gary or Liam would intersect them (if they were spheres with their centers located on the circumference of their walking circles) not as a diameter of their sphere, but as less than their diameters (a little closer to the central observer)... and by then there might be numerous relativistic principles to consider.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top