What Does t→0 Mean in Neutron Freeze-Out?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AuraCrystal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutron
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of neutron freeze-out during big bang nucleosynthesis, specifically the meaning of t→0 in relation to neutron abundance. As time approaches zero, neutrons reach their equilibrium abundance, denoted as X_n^{eq}, which is influenced by interactions with protons. Initially, neutrons existed in significant numbers due to pair production, but their abundance decreased as they began to decay with a half-life of about 15 minutes. By approximately 10 microseconds, neutrons were reduced to about one per billion photons, with most eventually decaying into protons. The exact time reference for t→0 in this context remains unclear, whether it pertains to the early moments around 1 microsecond or the later decay phase around 900 seconds.
AuraCrystal
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was reading about big bang nucleosynthesis recently (If it helps, I'm using Mukhanov) and it was calculating the abundance of neutrons. It seems to say that X_n→X_n^{eq} (It says that X_n^{eq} is the equilibrium abundance of neutrons) as t→0. So...does that mean that the neutrons have an abundance when they are first created and that is changed by the interactions with the protons?
 
Space news on Phys.org
I am not familiar with the context. However, free neutrons are radioactive with a half life of a little under 15 minutes, decaying into proton + electron + anti-neutrino.
 
Due to pair production, at around t = 1μ sec, neutrons would have existed (along with antineutrons) in roughly the same number as photons. Then after ~ 10 μ sec, the antineutrons were gone and the neutrons were down to around 1 per billion photons. (There were also proton- antiproton pairs but they should have completely annihilated.) Then the neutrons began to decay with half life ~900 sec. Most decayed into protons (+ electron & neutrino), but some were captured as the (stable) nuclei of 2H, 3He, 4He, and 7Li.
I'm not sure which "t→0" is referred to (wrt 900 sec or 1μ sec).
 
Last edited:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top