Question on optimization and limits

semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5
You are designing a rectangular poster to contain 50 cm2 of printing with margins of
4 cm each at the top and bottom and 2 cm at each side. What overall dimensions will
minimize the amount of paper used?

What i did was let the length and breath of the whole poster to be x and y so the area would be 50=(x-4)*(y-8) and perimeter=2(x-4)+2(y-8). Equate the area into the perimeter and differentiate Perimeter wrt y. However i got x=y which means its the maximum area?

Limit as x tends to 0 \frac{e^x + e^-^x -2}{1-cos2x}
Applied Hopital rule once and got 0/2 however answer is 1/2. Am i correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
semc said:
You are designing a rectangular poster to contain 50 cm2 of printing with margins of
4 cm each at the top and bottom and 2 cm at each side. What overall dimensions will
minimize the amount of paper used?

What i did was let the length and breath of the whole poster to be x and y so the area would be 50=(x-4)*(y-8) and perimeter=2(x-4)+2(y-8). Equate the area into the perimeter and differentiate Perimeter wrt y. However i got x=y which means its the maximum area?
What does it mean to "equate the area into the perimeter"?

I would approach this in a different way by letting w and h represent the width and height, respectively of the printed area. From these definitiions you get wh = 50.

Now what you want to do is to minimize the area (not perimeter) of the overall piece of poster paper, so you want to minimize A = (w + 4)(h + 8). Use the other relationship to rewrite A as a function of only one variable, and then do your calculus magic.

The stuff below seems to be unrelated to this problem.
semc said:
Limit as x tends to 0 \frac{e^x + e^-^x -2}{1-cos2x}
Applied Hopital rule once and got 0/2 however answer is 1/2. Am i correct?
 
for the 2nd problm... apply it once again...it will give the correct answer
after applyin it once it still gives 0/0 form...
 
Got it guys thanks
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top