Question on photon-nucleus pair production

sciencia
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm having a bit of trouble understanding why a nucleus is needed for a gamma ray to interact with in particle pair production. I know that all properties are conserved - spin, charge, etc. -, and I know that the photon must have at least the energy of twice the standing energy of the particle it creates (for electron-positron pairs this is 1.022 MeV, correct?), but why does a nuetral, massles particle (photon) create two charged, massive particles (i.e. an electron and positron), and why is a nucleus necessary?
I'm asking simply out of curiosity, and any answers would be highly appreciated.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try getting both total energy and total (vector) momentum before and after to add up. Remember that the energy-momentum four vector for the gamma ray is a null vector. Can you make a null vector from two time like massive particles' momenta?
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top