Question on Probabilty Percentages

  • Thread starter Thread starter taskforce141
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a probability problem concerning injured workers in an industrial plant. The initial calculations mistakenly used the conditional probability notation, leading to confusion about the correct values. The correct approach involves applying the Additive Rule for probabilities, which was ultimately acknowledged by the original poster. The final computed probability of either being admitted to the hospital or returning to work the next day is confirmed as 0.23. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate notation and understanding of probability concepts.
taskforce141
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello. The following is the problem for the question. I already tried it myself and think I got a good solution. Can anyone just check my results to make sure I have done everything correctly? Thank you very much in advance.

Homework Statement



An industrial plant is conducting a study to determine how quickly injured workers are back on the job following injury. Records show that 10% of all injured workers are admitted to the hospital for treatment and 15% are back on the job the next day. In addition, studies show that 2% are both admitted for hospital treatment and back on the job the next day. If a worker is injured, what is the probability that the worker will either be admitted to a hospital or be back on the job the next day or both?2. The attempt at a solution
P(T) = 0.1 (Admitted to hospital)
P(N) = 0.15 (Back to work the next day)
P(T|N) = 0.2 (Both)
P(S) = ?

P(S) = P(T) + P(N) - P(T|N)
= 0.1 + 0.15 - 0.02 = 0.23
 
Physics news on Phys.org
taskforce141 said:
Hello. The following is the problem for the question. I already tried it myself and think I got a good solution. Can anyone just check my results to make sure I have done everything correctly? Thank you very much in advance.

Homework Statement



An industrial plant is conducting a study to determine how quickly injured workers are back on the job following injury. Records show that 10% of all injured workers are admitted to the hospital for treatment and 15% are back on the job the next day. In addition, studies show that 2% are both admitted for hospital treatment and back on the job the next day. If a worker is injured, what is the probability that the worker will either be admitted to a hospital or be back on the job the next day or both?


2. The attempt at a solution
P(T) = 0.1 (Admitted to hospital)
P(N) = 0.15 (Back to work the next day)
P(T|N) = 0.2 (Both)
P(S) = ?

P(S) = P(T) + P(N) - P(T|N)
= 0.1 + 0.15 - 0.02 = 0.23

Your understanding of the concepts seems faulty. P(T|N) denotes the *conditional* probability of T, given that N occurs; in words, that would be the fraction of those workers who return the next day that are admitted to hospital. That is NOT what you were told. You were told the fraction who are both admitted and return the next day, that is, P(N & T). You were also told this is 2%, but you have listed it as 0.2, which is 20%.

In actual fact, P(T|N) = P(T & N)/P(N) = 0.02/0.15 = 2/15, which is nowhere near your figure of 0.2.

In your last line you did compute P(S) properly, but I am concerned about your previous mistakes and wonder whether you really did understand what you were doing in the last computation.

RGV
 
Thank you very much for your help. I now realize that I have mistakenly put 0.2, but if you see in the calculation I used the correct value 0.02.

I understand that I didn't use the correct notation in my calculations. Instead of P(T|N), I meant to use P(T & N) so I would then be able to use the Additive Rule,
P(A Or B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A & B). It seems I accidentally wrote down the wrong thing. All of this aside, I appreciate you checking my work. Thanks.
 
taskforce141 said:
Thank you very much for your help. I now realize that I have mistakenly put 0.2, but if you see in the calculation I used the correct value 0.02.

I understand that I didn't use the correct notation in my calculations. Instead of P(T|N), I meant to use P(T & N) so I would then be able to use the Additive Rule,
P(A Or B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A & B). It seems I accidentally wrote down the wrong thing. All of this aside, I appreciate you checking my work. Thanks.

Good. Glad to hear it (although, I suppose since I am reading this on a screen I am not really hearing it---but you know what I mean).

RGV
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top