Question on quantum entanglement mechanism

smithnya
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I can understand only the basic principle behind quantum entanglement. Do you guys know of the mechanism by which it works? I understand that there is no information being transferred between particles that react under entanglement. So what then is the hypotheses as to how one particle knows what the other is doing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In quantum mechanics, particles are described by their wave function. Wave functions keep evolving in a continuous, predictable manner until a measurement is made on the particle, and then the wave function "collapses", meaning the particle goes into a definite state. For instance, normally quantum particles don't have a definite position, but if you measure their position their wave function suddenly collapses and they acquire a definite position.

What's so special about entanglement is that instead of each particle possessing its own wave function, the system of the two particles are described by one big wave function. When either of the particles is measured, the wave function of the whole system collapses, and thus both particles go into definite states, even if they were separated by thousands of miles. So if you have two photons that are entangled, and you measure the polarization of one of them at a certain angle, and at the same time you measure the polarization of the other one at the same angle you'll find that they're both the same, however far apart they happen to be.

It should be noted, however, that the same quantum theory which tells us about this instantaneous connection between particles also tells us that it is impossible for people to use this connection to send information faster than light. That's called the no-communication theorem.

It should also be noted that many people's first reaction, including Einstein himself, when encountering this phenomenon is to assume that the quantum mechanical explanation is wrong or incomplete, and that when the two particles were created they were assigned a common piece of information, called a "hidden variable", which they are using to coordinate their behavior. There are, however, good reasons to believe that this kind of explanation of quantum entanglement doesn't work. See "quantumtantra.com/bell2.html" for a good explanation of this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
smithnya said:
I can understand only the basic principle behind quantum entanglement.
What is it?

smithnya said:
Do you guys know of the mechanism by which it works?
Depends on what you're referring to. Afaik, quantum entanglement is not understood. That is, there's no qualitative apprehension of how it works.

smithnya said:
I understand that there is no information being transferred between particles that react under entanglement.
Afaik, it isn't known that that isn't the case. But also just afaik, there's no compelling reason to assume that that is the case.

smithnya said:
So what then is the hypotheses as to how one particle knows what the other is doing?
Who/what says that "one particle knows what the other is doing?"
 
smithnya said:
Hello,
I can understand only the basic principle behind quantum entanglement. Do you guys know of the mechanism by which it works? I understand that there is no information being transferred between particles that react under entanglement. So what then is the hypotheses as to how one particle knows what the other is doing?

At this time, there is no known physical mechanism which is generally accepted. There are several interpretations, each with somewhat poorly defined mechanisms. MWI, Bohmian, Time Symmetric, etc.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top