Question on step potentials and schrodingers equatio

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marmot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potentials
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the behavior of wavefunctions in quantum mechanics, specifically regarding 1D step potentials and the Schrödinger equation. When solving the Schrödinger equation, two solutions typically arise due to its second-order nature, representing waves traveling in opposite directions. However, certain conditions, such as when the potential V exceeds energy E, lead to the vanishing of one solution, resulting in an exponential decay. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding boundary conditions and normalization to determine when solutions are valid or must be discarded.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wavefunctions
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation and its applications
  • Knowledge of potential energy concepts in quantum systems
  • Basic skills in solving second-order linear differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of boundary conditions on wavefunctions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about quantum tunneling and its mathematical representation
  • Explore normalization techniques for wavefunctions in quantum systems
  • Investigate the behavior of wavefunctions in various potential well scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students and self-learners of quantum mechanics, physicists dealing with wavefunction analysis, and educators seeking to clarify concepts related to step potentials and the Schrödinger equation.

marmot
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
I have a problem. I am trying to selfteach myself QM but I got stumped with this.

Basically, in the issue of 1D step potentias, I know that you have to divide the problem into regions and solve the Schrödinger equation for each one. However, when you solve it, you always get two solutions due to the nature of the second order linear differential equation. (One representig a current oming from the left and the other from the right) However, I know sometimes one of the solutions vanishes. For ezample. if V>E in a<x<infinity, the solution will be an exponential wih negative exponent because the positive one vanishes (due to the physicallity of quantum tunneling. In certain instances there will be two solutions because of reflection, etc. However, how do I know when a solution vanishes? Are they rules of thumb or you simply solve for the coefficients using initial conditions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A specific question would be if a potential well with infinite potenial in one side, zero in the middle, and a finite potenial in the right side would have both current going to the right and the left?
 
marmot said:
I have a problem. I am trying to selfteach myself QM but I got stumped with this.

Basically, in the issue of 1D step potentias, I know that you have to divide the problem into regions and solve the Schrödinger equation for each one. However, when you solve it, you always get two solutions due to the nature of the second order linear differential equation. (One representig a current oming from the left and the other from the right) However, I know sometimes one of the solutions vanishes. For ezample. if V>E in a<x<infinity, the solution will be an exponential wih negative exponent because the positive one vanishes (due to the physicallity of quantum tunneling. In certain instances there will be two solutions because of reflection, etc. However, how do I know when a solution vanishes? Are they rules of thumb or you simply solve for the coefficients using initial conditions?

In this case (in "bold"):
Lets say the wave is sent from the negative x-axis. In the region x<a, you will have two solutions because you have a wave traveling to the right (you sent it) and a reflected one from the potential. However, in the region a<x<oo we can't have two solutions. We only have a wave traveling to the right, no wave is traveling to the left since there is no other point (like a step potential) to reflect your wave.
So imagine a wave traveling at x=a, then some been reflected and other transmitted. The one that's been transmitted will be "alone" in that region (x>a).
 
Also, a solution that is non-normalizable has to vanish. This usually happens when it goes to infinity at some point, for example a solution of e^{bx} on the domain a&lt;x. The wavefunction would go to infinity as x\to\infty so there's no way to normalize it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K