Question: Quantum Two Time interpretation - arXiv article from Aharonov, et al.

EddieZ
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Please let me know if this is the wrong place to post this question.

I'm really fascinated by the idea of time symmetry in quantum mechanics and it's implications for the measurement process. I'm trying to make sense out of an article posted in the arXiv by Aharanov, et al. and it seems like there must be something really interesting here, but I can't quite follow it. Hoping someone in this forum would find it interesting and might be able to explain it to those of us with a lesser background...

arXiv Article on Two Time interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Cheers,
Ed
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EddieZ said:
Please let me know if this is the wrong place to post this question.

I'm really fascinated by the idea of time symmetry in quantum mechanics and it's implications for the measurement process. I'm trying to make sense out of an article posted in the arXiv by Aharanov, et al. and it seems like there must be something really interesting here, but I can't quite follow it. Hoping someone in this forum would find it interesting and might be able to explain it to those of us with a lesser background...

arXiv Article on Two Time interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Cheers,
Ed


a single word

Irrelevant

The authors use a version of quantum histories formalism (a generalization of path integral QM).

Moreover, the authors appear to be rather confounded on basic questions and develop an inconsistent mixture of reversibility with irreversibility, determinism with indeterminism, mixed with pure states, etc.
 
I would like to know the validity of the following criticism of one of Zeilinger's latest papers https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.07756 "violation of bell inequality with unentangled photons" The review is by Francis Villatoro, in Spanish, https://francis.naukas.com/2025/07/26/sin-entrelazamiento-no-se-pueden-incumplir-las-desigualdades-de-bell/ I will translate and summarize the criticism as follows: -It is true that a Bell inequality is violated, but not a CHSH inequality. The...
I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
This is not, strictly speaking, a discussion of interpretations per se. We often see discussions based on QM as it was understood during the early days and the famous Einstein-Bohr debates. The problem with this is that things in QM have advanced tremendously since then, and the 'weirdness' that puzzles those attempting to understand QM has changed. I recently came across a synopsis of these advances, allowing those interested in interpretational issues to understand the modern view...

Similar threads

Back
Top