Question regarding distance traveled up an incline?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance a bobsled travels up a 30-degree incline before stopping, given an initial speed of 25.0 m/s and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.60. Participants emphasize the importance of incorporating gravitational potential energy (PE) into the energy conservation equation, which includes both kinetic energy (KE) and work done by friction. One user suggests a formula but is advised to derive a custom equation based on the specific problem rather than relying on pre-existing formulas. The conversation highlights the need to understand the principles behind energy conservation and the role of friction and gravitational forces in the scenario. Ultimately, a thorough grasp of these concepts is essential for accurately solving the problem.
choyphin
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


After a bobsled race, the sled and riders have been partially slowed down up in an icy incline, but they need to be brought to a stop. This happens on a portion of track inclined at 30 degrees that has a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.60. The sled enters the incline at 25.0 m/s. How far does it travel along the incline before stopping?

Homework Equations


(1/2)mv(final)^2 - (1/2)mv(initial)^2 = Ffriction

The Attempt at a Solution


Im not sure how to incorporate the angle of the incline, but as an attempt, i did
1/2vi^2=FG(cos 30) d
and i got 88.3 m. I'm not sure if that's right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you're using an energy approach. Good. But don't forget gravitational PE, which increases as the sled goes up the incline.
 
How would you incorporate gravitational PE? and also, would the formula
d = vi^2 / [2g(sin30 + ucos30)] work?
 
choyphin said:
How would you incorporate gravitational PE?
What's the definition of gravitational PE? How do you calculate it?
and also, would the formula
d = vi^2 / [2g(sin30 + ucos30)] work?
I would advise against looking for a formula to plug into unless you fully understand what the formula means. Better to stick with the basics and derive your own formula, tailor-made to the specific problem. (That formula is close, but not quite right, anyway.)

The basic idea that you want to use is energy conservation:
Energy(initial) + Work done by friction(which is negative) = Energy(final)

Here "Energy" means total mechanical energy: KE + PE.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top