Question regarding elastic potential energy and work

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between elastic potential energy (EPE) and work done on a spring. It highlights that while the change in potential energy (ΔU) equals the work done for conservative forces, the calculations differ for elastic potential energy compared to gravitational potential energy. For a spring, the work done is calculated using the change in the square of the displacement, while for gravitational potential energy, it is a linear change in height. This discrepancy explains why the work done on the spring does not match the difference in potential energy between two positions. The key takeaway is that the formulas for EPE and gravitational potential energy operate differently due to their mathematical relationships with displacement.
gkangelexa
Messages
81
Reaction score
1
Hi! This is probably something silly but here goes.

My question involves elastic potential energy and work…
So we know that a change in potential energy = Work done, as long as the forces are conservative...
delta U = Work done
Let’s say we have a spring…
Work done/by on a spring is, W= ½ kx^2
Also, the potential energy at a position on the spring is: U =½ kx^2

So if we have a spring with K = 360, the potential energy if you push it in 5 cm is: U = (1/2)(360)(.05)^2 = .45
If we then push it to 12 cm, U is now (1/2)(360)(.12)^2 = 2.59

So the difference in potential energy from 5 cm to 12 cm is 2.59-.45 which is 2.14.

But the  U = Work done
The work done to move from 5 cm to 12 cm should be equal to the difference in potential energy from position 5 cm to position 12 cm.
But when I calculate the work done to push the spring from 5 cm to 12 cm (a difference of 7 cm) it’s (1/2)(360)(.07)^2 = .882…
.882 does not equal 2.14…

When I try this method with gravitational potential energy (U = mgh; W = mgh) it works.
The work done to lift an object from a height of 5 m to a height of 12 cm is equal to the difference in potential energy from 5 to 12.

Why doesn’t it work with elastic potential energy just like it works with gravitational potential energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi gkangelexa! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
gkangelexa said:
Work done/by on a spring is, W= ½ kx^2

But when I calculate the work done to push the spring from 5 cm to 12 cm (a difference of 7 cm) it’s (1/2)(360)(.07)^2 = .882…

no, .07 isn't x, it's ∆x :wink:
 
So why does it work with gravitational potential energy?

The work done to lift an object from a height of 5 m to a height of 12 cm is equal to the difference in potential energy from 5 to 12.
 
gkangelexa said:
So why does it work with gravitational potential energy?

The work done to lift an object from a height of 5 m to a height of 12 cm is equal to the difference in potential energy from 5 to 12.

When you are calculating the change in something you are subtracting two values.

For elastic PE

ΔPE = PE2-PE1 = ½ kx22 - ½ kx12 = ½ k(x22-x12)

and you can see that 122-52 ≠ 7

For gravitational PE:

ΔPE = PE2-PE1= mgh2-mgh1=mg(h2-h1)

and h2-h1 = 12-5 = 7.

For EPE you'd need to get the change in x2 while for GPE you'd just need the change in h (or x).
 
you guys are brilliant!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top