Question regarding systems in work & energy

AI Thread Summary
Understanding when net work becomes zero in physics problems involving systems is crucial. In conservative force fields, such as gravity, the net work around a closed path is zero, but this does not apply to all scenarios. The confusion often arises when defining the system, as including Earth in the system can lead to misunderstandings about energy conservation. It's important to analyze the specific forces and paths involved in each problem to determine whether net work is zero. Clarifying these concepts can help in accurately applying the principles of work and energy in physics.
Aghle Sorkh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My professor (for some weird reasons) makes us write "system [body(ies)]" whenever we are asked to solve a physics problem for work and energy. Systems make me completely confused because sometimes if we have two or more systems, then the net work becomes zero. My question is this: How do I know when the net work becomes zero? Please give me examples of writing "system _" when solving a question.

If the above doesn't make sense, here is an example:

Suppose there is a mass on the air with 0 initial velocity. Find the final velocity (assuming force of gravity is the only force acting on it). The way our professor asked us to solve it is by writing "system mass & earth"... in which case the work due to gravity apparently becomes zero (??). Please explain situations where net work becomes zero and where net work is not zero when I include Earth on my system... Sorry for the confusion!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;

An example where net work is zero:
The net work about any closed path in a conservative force field is zero.
Gravity is an example of a conservative force.

However, you profs example is odd since the path is not closed. But then, you have not fully described it.
I think you need to take us through the example more carefully.

What I suspect is happening is "conservation of energy": in a closed system the total change in energy is zero.
Since work is change in energy...
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
23K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top