Question: Solving the 10000-meter run time problem with constant acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem related to a runner's 10,000-meter race. The runner has 1,100 meters left after 27 minutes and needs to accelerate at 0.20 m/s² to finish in under 30 minutes. The initial velocity was incorrectly calculated in meters per minute instead of meters per second, leading to a significantly erroneous time estimate of 200 seconds. The correct approach should yield a time of approximately 3.1 seconds, as stated in the textbook. The key mistake was the unit conversion for the initial velocity.
kylera
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Bloody textbooks and their odd answers...

I've tried to solve this problem, and I've solved through it, only to realize that my answer and the book answer are drastically different. A keen eye in the process would be most appreciated.

Question: A runner hopes to complete the 10000-meter run in less than 30.0 minutes. After 27.0 minutes, there are still 1100 meters to go. The runner must then accelerate at 0.20 m/s^2 for how many seconds in order to achieve the desired time?

My solution:
Initial velocity = the rate at which the previous 8900 meters was covered in 27.0 minutes = 8900/27.0 = 3.29e2 m/s
Final velocity = the rate at which the last 1100 meters must be covered in the last 3.0 minutes = 1100/3.0 = 3.7e2 m/s

I then used the 'final velocity' = 'initial velocity' + 'time' * 'acceleration' equation, and got what I thought was, and turned out to be, an absurd value for 'time' = 200(!) seconds. The book says '3.1 seconds'. Can anyone see my mistake here so far, or what I should've or should not have done? Much thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your initial velocity is not in m/s- when you divided it, you got 329 m/minutes.
 
D'oh!

Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top