Question - Universal Speed Limit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of angular acceleration in a long cylinder and whether the effects of torque applied at one end would take a year to reach the other end, in line with the universal speed limit of light. Participants acknowledge the challenge of visualizing rotational motion and suggest that thinking in terms of a rope could simplify the understanding of the problem. The conversation also touches on personal experiences in Bemidji, Minnesota, and the local lakes, with a mention of potential academic transfers to nearby universities due to staffing issues at the local physics department. Additionally, there are considerations about the benefits of attending the University of North Dakota over the University of Minnesota, including cost and student-to-teacher ratios. Overall, the thread combines physics inquiry with personal anecdotes and academic advice.
Zarathustra1
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I understand that nothing--object or influence--can travel faster than c. However, something isn't quite clear to me.

Let's assume we have a solid rod or a cylinder that has any given radius and a light-year in length. If the cylinder is at first at rest, and then we apply a torque to this cylinder at one end, thus giving it angular acceleration, will it take a year for the other end of the cylinder to experience the angular acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
however, Zarathustra, Bemdji MN is a cool place. welcome! (have you ever swam or skied in Bad Medicine Lake, a little south of you? i had 30 years ago and thought it was wonderful.)
 
Integral said:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=98696" asks a similar question. The answer is the same.

Doh, I've been thinking too much about rotational motion lately. Thinking about it in terms of a rope would have been much more convenient in allowing me to answer the question myself.

however, Zarathustra, Bemdji MN is a cool place. welcome! (have you ever swam or skied in Bad Medicine Lake, a little south of you? i had 30 years ago and thought it was wonderful.)

Nope, can't say I've been to that lake (so many lakes around here it's hard to keep track of them all!). Bemidji is dandy indeed, though the BSU physics department is rather under-staffed, so I might end up going down to the twin cities and transfer to the University of Minnesota. Dunno yet though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Zarathustra said:
Doh, I've been thinking too much about rotational motion lately. Thinking about it in terms of a rope would have been much more convenient in allowing me to answer the question myself.
Nope, can't say I've been to that lake (so many lakes around here

not that many as clean as Bad Medicine Lake. it's on MN 113 west of uh.. what's that lake that is the source of the Mississippi? i don't remember the name (but somehow i remember this road, oh... it's Itasca).

it's hard to keep track of them all!). Bemidji is dandy indeed, though the BSU physics department is rather under-staffed, so I might end up going down to the twin cities and transfer to the University of Minnesota. Dunno yet though.

consider UND in Grand Forks (my alma). you have reciprocity and it'll be cheaper than UM. caveat, it's colder than a sorceress's bosum there (but it must also be in Bemidji) in January/February. also much better student to teacher ratio. cheaper housing. but more boring social life. and too many republicans and religious right, but not as bad as the western part of the state.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top