Questions about Battery Memory

  • Thread starter Thread starter RestlessMind
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Battery Memory
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the "memory effect" in rechargeable batteries, particularly NiCad and NiMH types. It is noted that the strict memory effect is largely a myth, affecting only certain early NiCad batteries under specific conditions. NiCad batteries are more vulnerable to damage from improper charging compared to NiMH batteries, which are considered more robust. Both battery types can experience temporary capacity reduction from partial charging and discharging, but this can be restored by fully cycling them. Overcharging poses a risk to both types, potentially causing permanent damage.
RestlessMind
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
Questions about Battery "Memory"

I've heard that rechargeable NiCad batteries can be damaged so that they experience a large drop in voltage (and thus appear to be dead) before they are completely dead by being discharged to a point (like halfway) and then being recharged. Then I've heard that NiMH batteries do not suffer from this, then that they actually do, then that the whole thing is a myth... :devil: what do you guys think about this battery "memory" effect?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Thanks for the info!

After reading over the first FAQ, I seem to come to the conclusion that NiCd batteries are a bit more "vulnerable" than NiMh batteries when it comes to charging and discharging. Do you think that NiMh batteries are more "tolerant" in any way?

Also, do you know if it is damaging to either battery type to partially charge it then discharge it fully?
 


NiMh are a bit more robust.
Partially discharing and recharging both types can (temporarily) reduce their capacity, but this can be restored by fully discharging and recharging.
But you can permanently damage them by overcharging.
 


Ah I see, that's what I was hoping for.
 


A thought; I understand that, for example, a 1000mAh battery must be charged with 100mA for 10 hours to be fully charged. So, would charging it with 100mA for 5 hours give it a 500mAh current?
 


Roughly yes.
The charging curve isn't quite linear (depends on how full the battery is) and you can't push it too far - you can't charge it in 1min with 60Amps for instance!

ps. you can't say a 500mAh 'current', mAh is an amount of energy so you shoudl say a 500mAh 'charge'
 


Roughly yes.
The charging curve isn't quite linear (depends on how full the battery is) and you can't push it too far - you can't charge it in 1min with 60Amps for instance!
Ah. Roughly how non-linear is it?

ps. you can't say a 500mAh 'current', mAh is an amount of energy so you shoudl say a 500mAh 'charge'
Got it.
 


mgb_phys said:
The strict "memory effect" is a myth, it effected certain early Ni-Cad batteries in very unusual circumstances.

It is by no means a "myth" with respect to NiCads. As a heavy NiCad user in the 80s, we had to factor it's effects on a continuing basis.

But there are many ways you can damage NiCad and NiMh batteries by improper charging, reducing their capacity.

Simple intro here - http://www.greenbatteries.com/nibafa.html
And an excellent and very complete guide - http://www.batteryuniversity.com/
 
  • #10


It is by no means a "myth" with respect to NiCads. As a heavy NiCad user in the 80s, we had to factor it's effects on a continuing basis.
Ah. I did read, however, that it was something that occurred when a NiCad was charged and discharged to at a quite precise point many times (such as in satellites), and unlikely to occur in consumer electronics.
 
Back
Top