Questions about my potential PhD advisor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the considerations of choosing a PhD advisor, particularly focusing on the implications of selecting a late-career faculty member. Participants explore the potential advantages and disadvantages of this choice in relation to academic and career outcomes, including postdoctoral opportunities and faculty positions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a mature PhD advisor may provide more stability and support compared to younger advisors who might be more focused on their own research agendas.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for a late-career advisor to retire before the completion of a student's PhD, which could impact supervision and support.
  • It is emphasized that discussions about expectations, milestones, and the advisor's commitments are crucial regardless of the advisor's career stage.
  • Some argue that established professors may offer valuable networking opportunities that could aid in securing post-graduation employment.
  • Participants highlight the importance of assessing the advisor's previous students' outcomes and their current commitments to gauge their availability and support for new students.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of views regarding the implications of choosing a late-career advisor, with some highlighting potential benefits while others caution about possible drawbacks. No consensus is reached on whether a late-career advisor is definitively better or worse than a younger one.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the variability in individual experiences with advisors, the lack of specific data on advisor effectiveness across different career stages, and the subjective nature of support and supervision expectations.

Who May Find This Useful

Prospective PhD students considering their advisor options, particularly those interested in the implications of advisor career stage on their academic journey.

Alex_Walker
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am considering a PhD program in Physics, and my prospective advisor is a more mature faculty member (full professor, late career). I am really interested in the field of study, and the advisor's students speak really highly of their experiences.

Are there any advantages or disadvantages to doing a PhD with someone who is an late-career advisor such as this? My goal after completing my PhD is to be competitive for postdocs and, ultimately (long-shot, I know), to secure a faculty position. With this goal in mind, what should I look for in an advisor in general?

Thank you for your advice!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think a mature PhD advisor is likely a better choice than a younger one who would be still trying to establish his/her academic career with cutting edge research.

The younger PhD would be more focused on the research and less so on the students working on it.

I knew a friend who got caught in the backwash of a research focused PhD who initially was interested in the work he was doing and then moved on to some other hot topic and pretty much ignored the hapless grad student.

He wasn’t alone there were others who got so frustrated they left the university believing they would never get their PhD while remaining in the program.

Eventually, the dept chair had to step in when one of the senior faculty asked why this prof wasn't graduating any of his grad students.
 
Generally speaking, you want to make sure that you have a frank conversation about what your graduate program is going to look like over it's entire duration. If he or she is planning to retire fully in 2 years, what's the plan for your supervision over a PhD, that's likely to last 4-6 years? But this goes for any professor, regardless of career stage. Someone who is new might decide to pack up and move across the country if an opportunity comes up. It's important that the supervisor and student both formally discuss the duration of the commitment.

It's also important to discuss things like expectations: what milestones are reasonable to aim for? How much independence can you expect as a student? How much are you comfortable with? (Both in terms of day-to-day work and project definition.) Formal weekly meetings or informal hallway chats at random? How will you be supported over the duration of the degree? When will that support run out?

Other things to consider are the professor's other commitments. What committees are they on? How many other graduate students do they have? Where have their previous students ended up?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
An established professor can be a remarkable asset in getting a job post-graduation. While not the only thing, networks can be incredibly important.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K