Questions in relation to the design of Rockets

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on designing a rocket optimized for high altitudes, emphasizing a mass fraction of 0.91, where 91% is fuel/propellant, 6% is payload, and 3% is structural. The initial weight of the rocket is set at 500kg, and the key to maximizing distance lies in selecting the appropriate propellant with a high specific impulse. The conversation also highlights the importance of defining the type of rocket—solid, hybrid, or liquid—when considering practical applications versus theoretical designs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rocket mass fraction principles
  • Knowledge of specific impulse in rocket propulsion
  • Familiarity with different types of rocket fuels (solid, hybrid, liquid)
  • Basic concepts of rocket design and aerodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research specific impulse values for various rocket propellants
  • Explore the differences between solid, hybrid, and liquid rocket engines
  • Learn about advanced rocket design techniques and simulations
  • Investigate safety measures and environmental impacts of rocket launches
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, rocket designers, students in aerospace technology, and hobbyists interested in high-altitude rocket design.

trfinck
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone, I'm in the process of designing a rocket that could achieve high(er) altitudes. Of course, I want to make the rocket as small as possible, but maximize the height. I understand that the Mass fraction of the craft should be 0.91, where 91%~ is fuel/propellant, 6%~ is payload, and 3% is structural.

My basic question is, assuming my initial weight(total) was around 500kg, what would be the best propellant/fuel to get the most distance? (cutting out factors such as air resistance and so forth)

Thanks in advanced!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your mass fraction should be as high as you can make it. It just works out that 9:1 fuel to everything else is a typical value. The final velocity (and as a result the high/distance it can travel) is entirely dependent on the specific impulse of the fuel and the mass fraction.

That said - you need to define a little bit more. Are you talking solid rocket, hybrid rocket, liquid rocket? Are you really building something, or is this a thought experiment? Does it need to be practical, or would killing a bunch of people in range of the exhaust plume be ok?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K