Questions on Capacitors Concepts: Battery Charging, Electric Fields, Work Done

  • Thread starter Thread starter easwar2641993
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors Concepts
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around key concepts of capacitors, specifically focusing on the charging process and the role of the battery. It clarifies that a battery pulls charges from one plate and pushes them to the other, creating net charges of opposite signs on the plates. An uncharged capacitor is described as having equal amounts of positive and negative charges, resulting in no net charge. The electric field developed during charging does require more energy for additional charge to be pushed onto the plates, as the potential difference increases. The conversation also touches on the derivation of energy stored in a capacitor and the complexities of moving plates to calculate work done, emphasizing the nuances of electric field interactions.
easwar2641993
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I have several questions about capacitor's concepts.
Q1)What does battery really do in charging a capacitor?
Q2)Uncharged capacitor doesn't mean the plates don't have any charges?
Q3)During charging,the developing electric field between the plates does have any effect in charging?
Q4)When charging is progressed,battery has to do more and more work until the potential difference becomes same.Is this right?

Energy stored in a capacitor of capacitance C:Let small work done dW to move a charge dq from one plate to another plate.Then at an instant let V be the potential difference of the capacitor and q be the charge in the plates.
=> dW=V.dq =>dW=q/C.dq
=>Integrating the above equation by q=0 to q=Q,then we get W=(Q^2*C)/2
I don't understand this derivation. Does a charge actually move from one plate to another within capacitor?

There is another derivation which also I cannot understand.It is about moving a plate by a small distance and calculating work.But I don't understand why someone moves that plate to move by about a small distance.Also it says electric field acting on one plate is σ/2ε and not σ/ε.Because one plate is held stationary and the other is moving .So it experiences attractive force of the other plate and it's own attraction to the other plate.And while determining the force, the latter term should be used right?

I am sorry but I am pretty weak in Physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Q1)What does battery really do in charging a capacitor?
It leads to net charges (of same magnitude and opposite sign) on both plates of the capacitor.
Q2)Uncharged capacitor doesn't mean the plates don't have any charges?
Uncharged capacitors do not have (net) charges on their plates (to a very good approximation).
Q3)During charging,the developing electric field between the plates does have any effect in charging?
Depends on your view of "have any effect". The electric field is related to the voltage in the capacitor, which can influence the charging process.
Q4)When charging is progressed,battery has to do more and more work until the potential difference becomes same.Is this right?
During the whole charging process, energy is transferred to the capacitor.
Does a charge actually move from one plate to another within capacitor?
Not through the gap (in an ideal capacitor), but you can consider this as an option. Charge can move through cables if you connect both sides.
But I don't understand why someone moves that plate to move by about a small distance.
Why not?
So it experiences attractive force of the other plate and it's own attraction to the other plate.
That is the same attraction.
 
Q1)What does battery really do in charging a capacitor?

It pulls charges out from one plate and pushes same type of charges onto the other plate.

Q2)Uncharged capacitor doesn't mean the plates don't have any charges?

A neutral plate has an equal amount of plus and minus charge, we often call that an uncharged plate. If two batteries have pushed the same minus charge onto both plates, we might say the capacitor is charged, or we might just as well say the capacitor is uncharged.

Q3)During charging,the developing electric field between the plates does have any effect in charging?

When some charge has been pushed onto a plate, pushing more charge requires more force, and therefore more energy.

Q4)When charging is progressed,battery has to do more and more work until the potential difference becomes same.Is this right?

To charge an almost empty capacitor a battery could use a very small voltage, if batteries could adjust their voltage.

Energy stored in a capacitor of capacitance C:Let small work done dW to move a charge dq from one plate to another plate.Then at an instant let V be the potential difference of the capacitor and q be the charge in the plates.
=> dW=V.dq =>dW=q/C.dq
=>Integrating the above equation by q=0 to q=Q,then we get W=(Q^2*C)/2
I don't understand this derivation. Does a charge actually move from one plate to another within capacitor?
One way to charge a capacitor is to take a charge from a plate and put it onto other plate.

Other way is to take a charge from a plate and store it somewhere, and take a charge from somewhere else and put that onto the other plate.

There is another derivation which also I cannot understand.It is about moving a plate by a small distance and calculating work.But I don't understand why someone moves that plate to move by about a small distance.Also it says electric field acting on one plate is σ/2ε and not σ/ε.Because one plate is held stationary and the other is moving .So it experiences attractive force of the other plate and it's own attraction to the other plate.And while determining the force, the latter term should be used right?

Well that just sounds all wrong.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top