Questions on Convergence of Sequence {an}: Find Its Limits

  • Thread starter Thread starter axe69
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences
axe69
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The sequence {an} is defined by

a1=1,an+1=\sqrt{1+an/2} ,n=1,2,3,4,...

(a) a^2n-2<0 , (b)a^2a+1-a^2n>0. deduce that{an} converges and find its limits?

please help me get the answer...
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Are the (a) and (b) a^{2n-2} and a^{2n-1}- a^{2n}&gt; 0? If so, what is "a" and what do they have to do with the given sequence?

Have you never seen any sequences like this before?? You don't seem to have even tried anything. While looking at a few terms won't prove anything, it might help you see what's happening: a_1= 1, a_2= \sqrt{1+ 1/2}= \sqrt{3/2}, a_3= \sqrt{1+ \sqrt{3/2}/2}= \sqrt{(2+ \sqrt{3/2})/2}. Does that look like it is increasing? Do you know any theorem about convergence of increasing sequences?

As for finding the limit, what happens if you take the limit on both sides of the equation a_{n+1}= \sqrt{1+ a_n/2}?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top