Questions on Electricity Generation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the origins of electrons in electricity generation, specifically addressing misconceptions about electron movement, erosion, isotopes, and radioactivity in conductive materials. Participants explore theoretical aspects of electron behavior in circuits and the nature of electric current.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Jason questions where electrons come from during electricity generation and suggests that if they originated from wires or magnets, there would be observable erosion or radioactivity.
  • One participant explains that electrons are pushed from atom to atom in a conductive circuit by electromotive force, clarifying that there is no excess of electrons in the wire.
  • Jason expresses concern that the movement of electrons implies some atoms must lose electrons, potentially leading to erosion or radioactivity.
  • Another participant describes the conduction band in metals, indicating that electrons are already moving randomly and that applying an electric field causes them to drift toward the positive terminal.
  • A participant corrects Jason's terminology, explaining that loss of electrons creates ions, not isotopes, and clarifies that radioactivity is primarily a nuclear phenomenon, not related to electron movement.
  • Another response emphasizes the necessity of a complete circuit for current flow, noting that without a continuous supply of electrons, the current would quickly diminish.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement, particularly regarding the implications of electron movement and the associated physical phenomena. Some participants clarify misconceptions, while others raise further questions about the nature of electric current.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of electron movement and its implications for atomic structure. The discussion includes varying interpretations of terminology related to atomic behavior and electric charge.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in the fundamentals of electricity, atomic structure, and the behavior of electrons in conductive materials.

JasonSCarter
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello all, This is my first post here, and I've got something that is stumping me. no this is not for homework, My question is this, When electricity is generated, where do the electrons come from? I mean if they we're coming from the copper wires, or magnets inside the dynamo wouldn't we see some sort of erosion, an isotope change, and radioactivity?

Jason
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
JasonSCarter said:
Hello all, This is my first post here, and I've got something that is stumping me. no this is not for homework, My question is this, When electricity is generated, where do the electrons come from? I mean if they we're coming from the copper wires, or magnets inside the dynamo wouldn't we see some sort of erosion, an isotope change, and radioactivity?

Jason

Welcome to the PF.

The electrons are being pushed from atom to atom in the conductive circuit (like around a wire) by the "electromotive force". There is not an excess of electrons, they are just being pushed along by some power source like a battery or power supply.

The only time you get an excess of electrons (more electrons than atoms) is when you collect them as part of an electrostatic charge (like the ESD shocks you get from rubbing things together).
 
Thank you for the response! I really appreciate it. However I'm curious, since there being pushed along, that means some atoms somewhere are having to lose an electron. which would denote some sort of erosion, an isotope change, and radioactivity?

Jason
 
JasonSCarter said:
Thank you for the response! I really appreciate it. However I'm curious, since there being pushed along, that means some atoms somewhere are having to lose an electron. which would denote some sort of erosion, an isotope change, and radioactivity?

Jason

In conductors like metals, there is a band of electrons that is "shared" between the atoms. So the electrons in this conduction band are moving from atom to atom randomly anyway. when you apply a field down the wire with a battery or whatever, they still move mostly randomly, but tend to drift in the direction of the positive terminal of the battery or power supply.

You can look up the Band Theory of Solids for more info. Here is a brief wikipedia page on Conduction Band, with links to more info.
 
Just for your information, Jason

Since you have heard of electrons I assume you have some idea of the the make up of atoms?

Erosion refers to whole atoms (usually lots of them)

Loss of electrons makes ions not isotopes.
Isotopes are determined by the neutrons in the atomic nucleus.
Loss of (or gain) of neutrons would definitely make new isotopes
Loss/gain of protons makes new elements

finally most radioactivity comes from the nucleus. not form the action of electrons (luckily for mankind) so we can safely use elctic gadgets without generation of radioactivity.
 
berkeman said:
In conductors like metals, there is a band of electrons that is "shared" between the atoms. So the electrons in this conduction band are moving from atom to atom randomly anyway. when you apply a field down the wire with a battery or whatever, they still move mostly randomly, but tend to drift in the direction of the positive terminal of the battery or power supply.

You can look up the Band Theory of Solids for more info. Here is a brief wikipedia page on Conduction Band, with links to more info.

Thank you again that's what I was looking for. I appreciate your patience :biggrin:
 
Jason
You have been told that you need a complete circuit for a current to flow. This is because you very soon run out of electrons to move along a piece of wire if there aren't fresh ones to enter and make up for the ones that have left. Actually adding or taking away electrons involves 'charging up' an object and this requires enormous voltages for even a small charge imbalance - much more than your average battery supplies.
If you have ever seen a Van der Graaff generator working you will have seen huge sparks but the actual amount of charge stored (and hence the average current flow as it discharges through your finger etc.) is very small.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K