Questions on genetic engineering

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the feasibility of genetic engineering, particularly the hypothetical creation of an army of never-aging kittens for global conquest. The conversation highlights the potential of genetic coding to evolve species over generations, referencing the historical context of human DNA and longevity. It contrasts the idea of removing DNA defects to restore a "pure" form against the goal of enhancing genetic traits, such as improved vision or the development of gills and wings. The discussion emphasizes the intersection of scientific advancement and ethical considerations in genetic engineering.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of genetic coding and its implications in genetic engineering
  • Knowledge of evolutionary biology and species adaptation
  • Familiarity with ethical considerations in biotechnology
  • Awareness of historical perspectives on human genetics and longevity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing techniques and their applications
  • Explore the ethical frameworks surrounding genetic modifications in organisms
  • Investigate the implications of synthetic biology on species evolution
  • Study the historical context of human DNA and its perceived purity
USEFUL FOR

Biotechnology students, genetic engineers, ethicists in the field of genetics, and anyone interested in the future of genetic modifications and their societal impacts.

seasnake
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
If I were to go into genetic engineering, college, intern, work in the field, whatever it would take, at the rate of the current advancement of the field, do you think it would ever be possible for me to genetically engineer an army of never aging kittens engineered for global conquest to take over the world. I mean, I assume that if I could figure out genetic coding a bit more, that perhaps it would be possible to evolve a species by thousands and millions of generations. Man hasn't had the ability for proper speach for most of man's ancestrial history, and I don't think man has ever been as cute as kittens, and so I favor a kitten army. Anyway, I'm also told by a lot of religious folk that in the beginning, man's DNA was pure and so man lived for much longer and never got sick or anything like that, so my next question is, do you think it is more benificial to try and remove DNA defects trying to return DNA to a more "pure" form, or is it a better goal to try and alter DNA to try and develope improved vision, gills, wings, and the like?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
i doubt that the religious people are giving accurate scientific statements/info etc
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K