MHB Questions regarding writing equations when given graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikea2424
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphs Writing
mikea2424
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm studying for a test this Friday and I have two problems that have completely stumped me. I'm not sure how to solve either. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

View attachment 7234

View attachment 7235
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    6.7 KB · Views: 118
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 111
Mathematics news on Phys.org
http://mathhelpboards.com/attachments/pre-calculus-21/7234d1503462274-questions-regarding-writing-equations-when-given-graphs-1-jpg

you should know these are both rational functions ... I leave the second graph for you to try.

for the first graph ...
(1) single zero at $x=1$
(2) y-intercept at $(0,-1)$
(3) horizontal asymptote appears to be $y=0$
(4) vertical asymptotes at $x=\pm2$, with the graph $\to +\infty$ for asymptote at $x=2$

$f(x)=\dfrac{a(x-1)}{b(x+2)(x-2)^2}$, where $a$ and $b$ are constants

$f(0)=-1=-\dfrac{a}{8b} \implies a=8b$. To fix $a$ and $b$ requires another point on the graph. I'm not going to try and eyeball another point, so to keep it simple, let $b=1$ ...
 
Thank you very much for replying to my original post.
View attachment 7238

I know that there is a zero at x=1. I know this zero touches the x-axis meaning that it is an even multiplicity. So the top of the fraction should look like (x-1)^2. The vertical asymptotes are x= \pm3. So the bottom of the fraction looks like (x+3)(x-3). This is where I get confused..visibly I can't tell what the horizontal asymptote is. I also am unsure which of the bottom factors I am to square, if any at all. From my notes I can gather that if the parabola goes downward as well as the curves then I am to square one of the factors on the bottom. I have tried squaring each, one at a time and input my equation into Desmos with no luck. As of right now all I know for sure is:

a((x-1)^2)/((x+3)(x-3))
 

Attachments

  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 106
The fact there is a horizontal asymptote tells you (numerator degree) < (denominator degree)

As of right now all I know for sure is:

a((x-1)^2)/((x+3)(x-3))

note the function's behavior near the vertical asymptote $x = 3$ indicates the value $(x-3)$ in the denominator is squared ,,,

$f(x) = \dfrac{a(x-1)^2}{b(x+3)(x-3)^2}$

$f(0) = -0.4 \implies \dfrac{a}{27b} = -\dfrac{2}{5} \implies b = -\dfrac{5a}{54}$

once again, not having a second point on the curve other than an x or y intercept ...

let $a = 1 \implies b = -\dfrac{5}{54}$ ...

$f(x) = -\dfrac{54(x-1)^2}{5(x+3)(x-3)^2}$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top