Quick Correlation and Causality: A Scientist's Perspective

  • Thread starter Thread starter clane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Correlation
clane
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

I am trying to look at some correlation numbers and while I am aware that correlation does not always indicate causality can a correlation coeffiecent that is very near to zero be used to indicate that it is not a cause?

Thanks

C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Elementary logic should give you the answer.

Causality => correlation.

Therefore: not correlation => not causality.
 
Let's be careful.

Causality does not always imply correlation because the relationship may be nonlinear. Correlation is a linear relationship.

If two variables are dependent, their relationship can be linear or nonlinear. If it's linear, their correlation will be significant. If their corr. is not significant, then you can say that the variables are not LINEARLY dependent on each other. But, they can still be non-linearly dependent.

So the answer is technically "No, a zero correlation does not mean no causality." A more roundabout way of putting it is: "A zero correlation would imply no causality only if a non-linear relationship can be excluded on other grounds."
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top