Quick question about method of Frobenius

  • Thread starter Thread starter TroyElliott
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frobenius Method
TroyElliott
Messages
58
Reaction score
3
So, when you use the Frobenius method on a differential equation, you assume a solution Σa_k*x^(k+s). Sometimes you get more than one solution for s in the indicial equation. Is the sum of these two solutions you get from evaluating the rest of the problem with each s solution the approximation at what ever point you were investigating on the ODE or are they two separate things not to be added together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TroyElliott said:
So, when you use the Frobenius method on a differential equation, you assume a solution Σa_k*x^(k+s). Sometimes you get more than one solution for s in the indicial equation. Is the sum of these two solutions you get from evaluating the rest of the problem with each s solution the approximation at what ever point you were investigating on the ODE or are they two separate things not to be added together?
If it's linear (which it must be to apply this method?) then necessarily a linear sum of solutions is also a solution.
 
There are three cases when using the method of Frobenius:

R1>R2 and the difference is an integer

R1>R2 and the difference is not an integer

R1=R2 (repeated roots).

Note R1 and R2 denotes roots.
Tell me what happens in these 3 cases.

From here I can see what you know and don't know.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top