Quick Resultant Forces Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating resultant forces using trigonometric functions for angles given in degrees. The user successfully decomposes forces at 65N and 30N but struggles with the 20N force at 250 degrees, seeking x,y coordinates for this angle. It is noted that the trigonometric functions for 250 degrees cannot be expressed simply and require a calculator for accurate values. Additionally, a suggestion is made to use the expansion of sin(3x) for further calculations. The conversation emphasizes the need for computational tools to handle specific angles in force calculations.
Pablo1122
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


s7rMLoN.png


So we have 65N @ 30*, 30N @ 180* and 20N at 250*

Homework Equations



Ncos(angle)i + Nsin(angle)j

The Attempt at a Solution



Using this video



I did the following.

F1(65N) = 65cos(30)i+65sin30i

Then using the radian circle I saw that 30* has x,y coordinates of sqrt3/2 and 1/2 respectively. So as shown in the video I did

65(root3/2)i+65(1/2)j

= 56.3i + 32.5j

I did this for the left one too (30N).

But for the one at the bottom (20N) I get the degree of it to be 250. (270-20) = 250.

250* is not on the radian circle so how can I write 250* in terms of x,y coordinates?
circle-unit-304560.gif


If we look at this radian circle. We see that 240* = (-1/2, -sqrt3/2) and then it goes to 270* = (0,-1). How can I find the x,y coordinates for 250* and use it in the equation?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pablo1122 said:
How can I find the x,y coordinates for 250* and use it in the equation?
I don't believe that trig functions of that particular angle can be simply expressed. (Like the others can.) You'll need a calculator.
 
Doc Al said:
I don't believe that trig functions of that particular angle can be simply expressed. (Like the others can.) You'll need a calculator.

Ah yes, I just found this out. Thanks!
 
Doc Al said:
I don't believe that trig functions of that particular angle can be simply expressed. (Like the others can.) You'll need a calculator.
If it's a matter of expressing it in surds, you can use the usual expansion of sin(3x), with x=20o, and apply the formula for solving cubics.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top