Quotient criteria and the harmonic series

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of the quotient criteria to the harmonic series, highlighting that the limit of the ratio of consecutive terms approaches 1, which does not satisfy the criteria for convergence. Participants clarify that while the limit appears to be less than 1, it actually converges to 1, leading to an inconclusive result regarding the series' divergence. The ratio test confirms that a limit of 1 does not provide information on convergence or divergence. To establish the divergence of the harmonic series, the integral test is recommended as a more effective method. The conversation emphasizes the limitations of the ratio test in this context.
foges
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Ok so you can't apply the quotient criteria to the harmonic series because:

lim_{k\to \infty}|\dfrac{a_{k+1}}{a_k}|

applied to the harmonic series:

lim_{k\to \infty}|\dfrac{1/(k+1)}{1/k}| = lim_{k\to \infty}|\dfrac{k}{k+1}| < 1
which does fullfill the quotient criteria, yet the harmonic series diverges...

So where else does it not work?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
foges said:
Ok so you can't apply the quotient criteria to the harmonic series because:

lim_{k\to \infty}|\dfrac{a_{k+1}}{a_k}|

applied to the harmonic series:

lim_{k\to \infty}|\dfrac{1/(k+1)}{1/k}| = lim_{k\to \infty}|\dfrac{k}{k+1}| < 1
which does fullfill the quotient criteria, yet the harmonic series diverges...
? No!
\lim_{k\to\infty}|\frac{k}{k+1}|= 1!

It does NOT "fulfill the quotient criteria".

So where else does it not work?
 
ok, so its the fact that it converges to 1 which makes it not work?
 
What exactly do you think the ratio test says?

It looks to me like it does exactly what it claims to do!
 
The fact that the ratio test gives 1 is an inconclusive result - it does not tell us it converges or diverges. More is needed to show this series diverges.
 
If you are looking to establish the divergence of the harmonic series try using the integral test.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top