B Quotient Limit Law: Find the Value of the Limit

FS98
Messages
105
Reaction score
4
The quotient limit laws says that the limit of a quotient is equal to the quotient of the limits.

If we had a limit as x approaches 0 of 2x/x we can find the value of that limit to be 2 by canceling out the x’s.

If we split it up we get the limit as x approaches 2 of 2x divided by the limit as x approaches to of x. That would give us 0/0 so wouldn’t the new answer be undefined?

I must be doing something wrong because I think they should be giving the same answer.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You omitted an important part of the quotient limit law. The limit for the denominator cannot be zero, otherwise the law is not applicable.
(In addition, both limits have to exist)
 
  • Like
Likes FS98
FS98 said:
That would give us 0/0 so wouldn’t the new answer be undefined?
0/0 isn't a number, but the usual terminology is the indeterminate form ##\frac{[0]}{[0]}##, which is just one of several indeterminate forms that can arise from limits.

When you take a limit and arrive at this indeterminate form, it doesn't mean that the limit isn't defined -- all it means is that you can't tell without additional work whether the limit exists.

Here are three examples of the indeterminate form ##\frac{[0]}{[0]}##, all with different results.
##\lim_{x \to 0} \frac {2x} x## -- limit exists and is 2.
##\lim_{x \to 0} \frac {x} {x^2}## -- limit does not exist.
##\lim_{x \to 0} \frac {x^3} x## -- limit exists and is 0.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top