Automotive Race car suspension Class

Click For Summary
The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding race car suspension dynamics to improve handling and performance. Key issues include the car's tendency to push while entering corners and being loose upon exit, which can be addressed by adjusting downforce and the third link location. The roll center and instant center are critical factors in suspension design, affecting tire loading and grip during cornering. The conversation also highlights the significance of software tools like Suspension Analyzer for optimizing suspension geometry. Overall, proper suspension setup is essential for maximizing tire contact and achieving competitive performance on the track.
  • #181
hey mike
i'll have to look at the data sheets and get some numbers for you. we have different
shocks on both super late models.all i know is the valve has three dots on the rebound
side and three .o10 shims i think on the shaft.the front shocks are i think 7500 penskes
on one car they came on it with remote canisters.were goint to try the performace
software this weekend and see how the numbers show up.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #182
did you bench mark the suspension points on the car? ( map all the mounting points) what program did you get from performance software?
you know this already ..but for those viewing..make ONE change at a time..like the sway bar...pyro the tires and record the temps..I am very interested to heart where the RC is on the front end..lot of work but..in my opinion..the software will really tell the whole story and instead of bandaiding the car to remedy a poor design ..you can make serious chassis changes relative to the CG and RC then spring it accordingly..
for those new to motorsports..there is a whole lot of superstition ...no green cars..never say good luck...
so i'll say get a checker
 
Last edited:
  • #183
hey mike
we used the performance trend suspension analyzer and it says the roll center is 12"
to the left.we also used the chassis r&d roll center software that we had and it says
the roll center is 10" to the right i feel a lot beter with the chassis r&d it's easy to use
and i think more accurate.we will try the 400 pound sway bar next race and get the
roll center to the 3 to 4" to the right.and about 3 1/2 " high. we have lots of slugs
so we will change what we need.and maybe take some rebound out of the front
shocks and add back in with the adjustments on the shocks if needed.no luck on the
shock dyno sheets mike? are shocks are penske 7 in the front 9 in back with nitro
canister set to 80psi coil overs revalved by someone else.thanks for all the info.
 
  • #184
Steve09- excellent work
until the roll center is where it should be, every thing you do is a band aid,,,but the sway bar change will get you closer to the " ideal " numbers for all the late model race cars noted in my references...use the software and make changes in the upper ball joint heights, mount heights, upper A-arm length to bring in the roll centers. You can tweak the bottom ball joint locations a little but I think the uppers are the easiest. careful measurement is critical so take your time,,rewards are immense,,,meanwhile I am checking with my shock guy on penskes for the 2700 pound car..
 
  • #185
hey mike
we moved the roll center to 1.82 to the right and 3.68 on the height static and dynamic
it moved to 5.65 to the right and 2.843 on the height.with 1" of dive and 2.5" of roll and
put the 400 lb bar in.reset are bump steer because it changes everytime you change your
roll center.set the right side to bumping out .008 and the left at .000 at 2" of travel next
time we race i'll make sure the tire temps stay good.only thing were not sure on is the
shocks.thanks again.
 
  • #186
Here is my project. I am starting to design a new style front suspension for a dwarf car. For those of you that may not know much about Dwarf Cars they are a scale race car that weighs 1240 lbs, use a 4 cylinder motorcycle engine, and a cut down Toyota rear end. The front end that most of them use is a old style single kingpin set up with long rear struts that go back to the front upright of the roll cage. What I'm wanting to go to is a more modern upper A-Arm/Lower Control Arm set up using heim joints instead of ball joints. My idea is to start with the front end of a Dirt Late model, scale it down, and work form there.

Any and all opinions and thoughts are welcome and as I get more into the project I will post update and pictures.

Thanks
 
  • #187
Welcome. It sounds like you thought things out pretty good. When you are finished wit the measurements, send them to me and i will run them thru the software to find the roll centers. What type of rear suspension is on the car? There is a whole lot of work required to glue on a new front end...hopefully you have the time money and tools..thank you for inviting us on this venture andlet me know if i can help..
RM
 
  • #188
Thanks Ranger Mike, the rear suspension on the dwarfs are a solid mounted three-link, some of them are using a rubber biscuit on the right side bar, some are running a solid bar there, and a spring loaded pull bar mounted above the rear end for forward bite. The cars also run a J-Bar/Panhard Bar in the rear.
 
  • #189
You guys run staggered tires and spools to help the car turn in?
 
  • #190
Yes, the cars run anywhere from an 1" to 3" of rear stagger and full or mini spooled rear ends.
 
  • #191
Cogitating about rear stagger on spooled solid rear axle on a dirt track when we spin it up either throughout the corner for a heavy track or from mid corner out on a drier/slicker track.

The main purpose of stagger on a spooled axle is to match the roll out difference between inside and outside rear tire due to the rear axle track (i.e. inside tire circumscribes a smaller radius arc then the outside tire). We can calculate this all out but it really isn't worth it as we very rarely know the true path radius of the car through the turn. Nor do we know the banking angle for stagger correction.

So what is everyone's opinion about the effect of stagger when we spin up the rear tires. Is there still a stagger effect or not? And if there is what is the effect?
 
  • #192
tire stagger simply means one tire is smaller in circumference than the other at opposite end of a solid rear axle. it generally means the left rear is smaller than the right rear. It is used so that both tires rotate at the same speed (solid rear axle only) when going through a corner.The amount of stagger is directly proportional to the turn radius. The tighter the turn the more stagger you need.
On dirt, with a spool. you still need stagger. As you know, a dirt track will change through the night. You can have slurry conditions to hard packed "pavement like" conditions. The 4 link rear suspensions really hook up and you need to know the stagger. Do not forget that the tire will grow and stagger will change as the right rear is loaded and starts to hook up ( spins on turn exit as you nail it). Heat makes the tire grow and you get heat when you accelerate.
You need stagger to control under steer wit ha locked rear differential.
 
  • #193
Ranger Mike said:
tire stagger simply means one tire is smaller in circumference than the other at opposite end of a solid rear axle. it generally means the left rear is smaller than the right rear. It is used so that both tires rotate at the same speed (solid rear axle only) when going through a corner.The amount of stagger is directly proportional to the turn radius. The tighter the turn the more stagger you need.
On dirt, with a spool. you still need stagger. As you know, a dirt track will change through the night. You can have slurry conditions to hard packed "pavement like" conditions. The 4 link rear suspensions really hook up and you need to know the stagger. Do not forget that the tire will grow and stagger will change as the right rear is loaded and starts to hook up ( spins on turn exit as you nail it). Heat makes the tire grow and you get heat when you accelerate.
You need stagger to control under steer wit ha locked rear differential.

Agreed. And I understand stagger and its use. My point was that how stagger effects the car will be different when the car is at a drift angle in the corner with the rear tires spinning. Part of the forward thrust is being utilized to keep the car on the current circular path toward the center of the corner and part is being used to accelerate the car from mid turn off tangential to the corner. This is a different concept then just using stagger to match the different wheel speeds caused by the track width and different radii traversed by the two rear tires such as on asphalt with a spooled rear.

In a spinning mode the larger outside tire will have a slightly higher surface speed than the smaller inside tire at a given axle speed (rpm). So my gut is telling me there is a difference in the effect of stagger when you 'back it in' on dirt as opposed to driving it through on a hard packed or asphalt surface. Thoughts?
 
  • #194
good points all..will let others reply whilst i go to the corner carry out for some beer ...and pork rines?
 
  • #195
Ranger Mike,

I understand your point, for sure. We do that now, keep track of stagger changes and effects on the cars handling. By 'cut and try', which is not a bad thing, you find the range of stagger for a particular car for particular track conditions on a particular size track.

This all came on while standing in turn one at the local 1/4 mile dirt track last Friday night while the track was still loose. I got to thinking about how the flat track motorcycle boys 'do it' and the cars were mimicking that attitude for those particular track conditions. And then of course I started to ask myself, self, do we really understand what stagger is doing in this mode. So far 'self' is confused in finding a link between the two. Or, I may be breathing just a little too much methanol exhaust. :-)
 
  • #196
the short answer is that with two rear wheels and a locked differential, you need stagger tuned to the radius of the turn. If you have too much you are loose, not enough and you will push. Motorcycles don't fight this problem. 1/4 mile flat track needs 4 inch stagger.
 
  • #197
Ranger Mike
thanks for the advice we put the 400lb sway bar in and we run a lot better,and with some
luck on are side,we won on friday and saturday in two different classes.8 sraight in the
limted late model.still would like to no something on the shocks,we think we may have
to much rebound or not enough.in the front are there any books on shiming and valving
shocks,that you no of.we got the roll center good and we are still allitle tight in the middle and on entry,should we try more stager we only run 1" to 1 1/2.with a detroit locker.quick change.
 
  • #198
that is good news..you are getting real close.
yes try a just a little more stagger. this will help free up in the middle of the turn.you can add a little sway bar pre load too.
pushing going in ..make sure the brake bias is not too high for the front brakes..back off front bias just a little until the rear brakes start to do more work.
i will check with the guy who has been the SHOCK rebuild "god" for years on the shim package for the penske shocks,
 
  • #199
Ranger Mike
we have some extra shocks so we dyno them, and the front has about 50 to 60 on compression and 690 on rebound.we will keep them in the car trailer,with springs
on them and change over to them to see what happens.try 2" of stager and check
the brake bias we have a pressure gauge on the brake calipers so we have a good
idea how much rear brake is in the car,thanks for the advice.
 
  • #200
steve
from my old notes on shocks
Lft front 76
Rt ft - 76
left rear 946 or 95
rt rear - 94

my open wheel shock genius can rebuild them of $ 125 to $ 150 each but..if you can do it and dyno them save the $$
i am calling old round track guy who specialized in penske rebuild so may have a recommended ship package for you

i can tell you that you need to rebuild each season.these shims will flex and become too weak and the oil with foam and be ineffective dampening the shock action after so many compression/rebound cycles..this happened to us last season as we let this go too long..

steve09 - see private message with cell phone number
for Penske nascar shock guy.
i talked to him and he can rebuild them to recommended half mile specs for $50 each..this is dirt cheap and they will be dynoed..he can change jets to be more compression on fronts and rebound on rears..he needs to know if track is smooth or bumpy, car weight, spring rate on each corner, and track length and banking,,he can turn them around in one day if need be,,once you get these you will have detailed parts list of the jets and shim package and can dyno them and base line each one for next years rebuild..
you should have him do it the first time because he has done it for years and he will keep it confidential..
my opinion
rm
 
Last edited:
  • #201
I have really enjoyed reading everyones posts.
We currently run a 4 cylinder dirt track car on mainly 1/4 mile ovals.
Our car runs a fabricated rear with 4 equal radius arms 22in long
Panhard bar mounted to right of chassis
Coil overs mounted on top of diff tubes .Car is limited to road radial on a 7 inch rim.
Always have trouble getting traction and LR always runs cold.
Is it possible to angle top bars up without bird cages to improve drive.
Any ideas would be appreciated.
 
  • #202
Thanks..always nice having a fellow racer ,post in..

before you start changing angles, the basic problem is the LR is cold..right..you need to add more cross weight..this will help cool off the right front tire as well..rule of thumb..if the LR is 25 degrees cooler than the right front, you do not have enuff cross weight,,,add more at the LR..do you have scales?
 
  • #203
Yes the car has been weighed but we don't see much improvement when we change corner weights.
With the car running parallel bars we probably are not experiencing much anti squat and the car always appears to fall over on the right rear.We have raised the rear roll centre to help with this.
The reason I am concerned is we buildng a new car and not to sure which way to go.
The rules are fairly open regarding suspension.
We are looking at a 3 link with pull bar for 3 rd link as well as a 4 link but have no experience with either of these set ups .
Any ideas would be appreciated.
 
  • #204
3 link is easier to learn but the hot set up on dirt is 4 link and i would start there. the question is, will you keep the present set up? if so we need to know a lot more information..if not, then any data regarding set up will not be useable.
 
  • #205
This thread has a ton of useful information!
I'm no expert but I'm trying to relate these setuPs to the ones I use on a radio controlled 1/8 scale late model. We have a very competitive class just like the real cars its all about setup.

They are awd buggy based chassis converted to latemOdels. I normally run a 220' run line with med bank and med bite.
Independent front and rear a arms with lots of adjustment.

My first questions are:
Do you always want the roll center located as low as possible and to the right?
Front only or rear too?
What's more beneficial? softer springs toned down with sway bars and adjust the RC to keep from bottoming or stiffer springs with a lower RC? Seems like softer will be better for traction.

We have about 8 lbs total weight to work with so we need all the help we can get to add traction on the things.
 
Last edited:
  • #207
thorpe..pretty nice tech racer...
welcome,,i got no clue regarding these cars..stock cars started running sway bars to permit the car to run lower ride height when the speeds started to rise and aero came into play more significantly. The sway bar would add in spring rate during cornering and the softer spring package meant lower ground clearance. In my opinion, softer is always better because you can make use of the SUSPEND.. sion..otherwise you have a giant go cart. I saw a formula car running 1200 pounds springs and two months later the upper arms were cracked..no way..
Roll centers..again my opinion..lower is better until you reach the point it impacts the suspension movement.Same ewith the Rc offset..you need to plant the right front but not too much so you need to balance it..
if these cars are as tech as they look then the principles should transfer and you are on the way to many checkers..
 
Last edited:
  • #208
Thanks for the reply and info!

One new thing I'm tryin for the race this sat is limited down travel so the left doesn't lift much ( body roll) which I predict to force the right side to do the work and push the CG lower while cornering.
 
  • #209
I appreciate you taking time for me and my toys ranger mike. Lol

The setup and how it affects these cars is as much fun as racing them to me.
 
  • #210
not that we ever did this ..but i heard of one racer who used the engine oil pressure to move a hydraulic cylinder that pivoted ballast weights to the left rear during the warm up lap..then locked them into place. on the cool down lap after the checker, he released the lock mechanism and the ballast weight plate returned to its position. the car had to go over the weight scales and always read 56 % left side weight...a small radio activated linear motor and some weights??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K