Radial acceleration in a pendulum

AI Thread Summary
Radial acceleration in a pendulum is expected to resemble a sine wave, consistently oriented in a positive direction due to its nature. This acceleration maintains the same frequency as tangential acceleration but differs in directionality. When considering a rotating frame, excluding gravity, the acceleration trace may resemble centripetal acceleration. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these concepts independently rather than relying solely on external resources. Engaging with the material directly can enhance comprehension of pendulum dynamics.
Sam Smith
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I'm just trying to think how I would expect radial acceleration to look like in a pendulum. I would expect a sine wave of sorts but instead of oscillating around zero I would expect it to be around a positive number as this acceleration is always in the same direction. Also if I was to compare this to the tangential acceleration it would have the same freq but as I say, be in the positive direction. Just wanted to check my reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I am thinking more specifically of the rotating frame (I know in the inertial frame the radial acceleration changes direction) (ie fixed on the pendulum bob itself) So if you exclude gravity I am wondering what the acceleration trace would typically look like? Or perhaps its better known as centripedal acceleration?
 
Hi Sam,

Sorry, I deleted my reply right after I posted it, since I got the terms radial and tangential backwards in my reply. Here is a pretty good web page with animations of velocities and accelerations for pendulums:

http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/waves/Lesson-0/Pendulum-Motion

:-)
 
Why don't you simply work it out? There is no need to be dependent on the work of others if you simply exercise your brain and figure it out for yourself.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top