Radial acceleration of a particle in a groove on a turntable

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the radial acceleration of a particle sliding in a frictionless groove on a rotating turntable. The setup involves defining a cylindrical coordinate system and expressing the particle's position, velocity, and acceleration in these coordinates. There are concerns about the consistency of the expressions for velocity and position, particularly regarding the direction of the velocity vector and the relationship to angular velocity. Suggestions include redefining the origin of the coordinate system and potentially using Cartesian coordinates for clarity. The main goal is to accurately express the radial acceleration in terms of the defined parameters.
Jacer10
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A horizontal turntable rotates at a constant rate ω about a fixed vertical axis through its center O. A particle of mass m can slide in a fictionless circular groove of radius r centered at O' which is r/3 from O. What is the radial acceleration of m in direction O'm?

problem.png


Derived from a problem in MIT OCW 16.61 (http://web.mit.edu/course/16/16.61/www/pdfs/SampleQuiz-2.pdf) and Princples of Dynamics by Greenwood.

Homework Equations


\dot{\vec{e}_r} = \dot{\theta}\vec{e}_\theta
\dot{\vec{e}_\theta} = -\dot{\theta}\vec{e}_r

From a previous part of the question:
\dot{\theta}^2 = \omega^2\frac{2}{3}(1-cos\theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to understand expressing the position, velocity, and acceleration of the particle in cylindrical coordinates and am currently stuck on how to express the acceleration in terms of cylindrical coordinates.

Define cylindrical coordinate system at O' with \vec{e}_r along O'm and \vec{e}_\theta
Position of m p_m = r\vec{e}_r
Velocity of m v_m = v_{O'} + v_{O'm} = \frac{r}{3}\omega\vec{e}_r + r\dot{\vec{e}_r}= \frac{r}{3}\omega\vec{e}_r + r(\dot{\theta} + \omega)\vec{e}_{\theta}

Acceleration of m a_m = \frac{r}{3}\omega\dot{\theta}\vec{e}_\theta + r\ddot{\theta}\vec{e}_{\theta} + r(\dot{\theta} + \omega)\dot{\theta}\vec{e}_{r}

Radial accleration a_r = r\dot{\theta}^2 + r\omega\dot{\theta} = r(\omega^2\frac{2}{3}(1-cos(\theta)) + \omega \dot{\theta}

-----------
From the attached solution, the radial acceleration should be a_r = -r(\dot{\theta} + \omega)^2 + \frac{r\omega^2}{3}cos\theta

answer.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jacer10 said:
I am trying to understand expressing the position, velocity, and acceleration of the particle in cylindrical coordinates and am currently stuck on how to express the acceleration in terms of cylindrical coordinates.

Define cylindrical coordinate system at O' with \vec{e}_r along O'm and \vec{e}_\theta
Position of m p_m = r\vec{e}_r

Velocity of m v_m = v_{O'} + v_{O'm} = \frac{r}{3}\omega\vec{e}_r + r\dot{\vec{e}_r}= \frac{r}{3}\omega\vec{e}_r + r(\dot{\theta} + \omega)\vec{e}_{\theta}

Acceleration of m a_m = \frac{r}{3}\omega\dot{\theta}\vec{e}_\theta + r\ddot{\theta}\vec{e}_{\theta} + r(\dot{\theta} + \omega)\dot{\theta}\vec{e}_{r}

Radial accleration a_r = r\dot{\theta}^2 + r\omega\dot{\theta} = r(\omega^2\frac{2}{3}(1-cos(\theta)) + \omega \dot{\theta}

-----------
From the attached solution, the radial acceleration should be a_r = -r(\dot{\theta} + \omega)^2 + \frac{r\omega^2}{3}cos\theta
One problem I see is that your expression for the position doesn't depend on ##\omega t##. You should also have ##\vec{v} = \dot{\vec{r}}##, and given this, it doesn't appear your two expressions are consistent, e.g., where did ##\vec{v}_{O'}## come from? Your expression for ##\vec{v}_{O'}## isn't correct either. It doesn't point in the ##\hat{e}_r## direction.

What I would do set the origin of your coordinate system at O and write ##\vec{r} = \vec{r}_{O'} + \vec{r}'## where ##\vec{r}_{O'}## is the position of O' and ##\vec{r}'## is the position of the mass relative to O'. (You might have done this already in deriving the expression for T). Then the acceleration along O'm is given by ##\hat{r}' \cdot \ddot{\vec{r}}##.
 
Setting O as the origin of the coordinate system and \vec{e}_r in the direction of O to O', would the following components be correct?
r_O' = \frac{r}{3} \vec{e}_r
r_{O'm} = -r cos(\theta + \omega t) \vec{e}_r
r_{OM} = r_O' + r_{O'm}
 
No. The way you defined ##\hat{e}_r##, it points along O'm, so why would ##\hat{r}'_O## point in the same direction? ##\hat{r}'_O## is directed along the line connecting O and O'. Also, ##\vec{r}_{O'm}## should have magnitude ##r## since the mass is constrained to a circle about O'. Your vector's magnitude varies with time because of the cosine factor.

I'd suggest working in cartesian coordinates.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top