Radial acceleration of a particle in a groove on a turntable

Jacer10
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A horizontal turntable rotates at a constant rate ω about a fixed vertical axis through its center O. A particle of mass m can slide in a fictionless circular groove of radius r centered at O' which is r/3 from O. What is the radial acceleration of m in direction O'm?

problem.png


Derived from a problem in MIT OCW 16.61 (http://web.mit.edu/course/16/16.61/www/pdfs/SampleQuiz-2.pdf) and Princples of Dynamics by Greenwood.

Homework Equations


\dot{\vec{e}_r} = \dot{\theta}\vec{e}_\theta
\dot{\vec{e}_\theta} = -\dot{\theta}\vec{e}_r

From a previous part of the question:
\dot{\theta}^2 = \omega^2\frac{2}{3}(1-cos\theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to understand expressing the position, velocity, and acceleration of the particle in cylindrical coordinates and am currently stuck on how to express the acceleration in terms of cylindrical coordinates.

Define cylindrical coordinate system at O' with \vec{e}_r along O'm and \vec{e}_\theta
Position of m p_m = r\vec{e}_r
Velocity of m v_m = v_{O'} + v_{O'm} = \frac{r}{3}\omega\vec{e}_r + r\dot{\vec{e}_r}= \frac{r}{3}\omega\vec{e}_r + r(\dot{\theta} + \omega)\vec{e}_{\theta}

Acceleration of m a_m = \frac{r}{3}\omega\dot{\theta}\vec{e}_\theta + r\ddot{\theta}\vec{e}_{\theta} + r(\dot{\theta} + \omega)\dot{\theta}\vec{e}_{r}

Radial accleration a_r = r\dot{\theta}^2 + r\omega\dot{\theta} = r(\omega^2\frac{2}{3}(1-cos(\theta)) + \omega \dot{\theta}

-----------
From the attached solution, the radial acceleration should be a_r = -r(\dot{\theta} + \omega)^2 + \frac{r\omega^2}{3}cos\theta

answer.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jacer10 said:
I am trying to understand expressing the position, velocity, and acceleration of the particle in cylindrical coordinates and am currently stuck on how to express the acceleration in terms of cylindrical coordinates.

Define cylindrical coordinate system at O' with \vec{e}_r along O'm and \vec{e}_\theta
Position of m p_m = r\vec{e}_r

Velocity of m v_m = v_{O'} + v_{O'm} = \frac{r}{3}\omega\vec{e}_r + r\dot{\vec{e}_r}= \frac{r}{3}\omega\vec{e}_r + r(\dot{\theta} + \omega)\vec{e}_{\theta}

Acceleration of m a_m = \frac{r}{3}\omega\dot{\theta}\vec{e}_\theta + r\ddot{\theta}\vec{e}_{\theta} + r(\dot{\theta} + \omega)\dot{\theta}\vec{e}_{r}

Radial accleration a_r = r\dot{\theta}^2 + r\omega\dot{\theta} = r(\omega^2\frac{2}{3}(1-cos(\theta)) + \omega \dot{\theta}

-----------
From the attached solution, the radial acceleration should be a_r = -r(\dot{\theta} + \omega)^2 + \frac{r\omega^2}{3}cos\theta
One problem I see is that your expression for the position doesn't depend on ##\omega t##. You should also have ##\vec{v} = \dot{\vec{r}}##, and given this, it doesn't appear your two expressions are consistent, e.g., where did ##\vec{v}_{O'}## come from? Your expression for ##\vec{v}_{O'}## isn't correct either. It doesn't point in the ##\hat{e}_r## direction.

What I would do set the origin of your coordinate system at O and write ##\vec{r} = \vec{r}_{O'} + \vec{r}'## where ##\vec{r}_{O'}## is the position of O' and ##\vec{r}'## is the position of the mass relative to O'. (You might have done this already in deriving the expression for T). Then the acceleration along O'm is given by ##\hat{r}' \cdot \ddot{\vec{r}}##.
 
Setting O as the origin of the coordinate system and \vec{e}_r in the direction of O to O', would the following components be correct?
r_O' = \frac{r}{3} \vec{e}_r
r_{O'm} = -r cos(\theta + \omega t) \vec{e}_r
r_{OM} = r_O' + r_{O'm}
 
No. The way you defined ##\hat{e}_r##, it points along O'm, so why would ##\hat{r}'_O## point in the same direction? ##\hat{r}'_O## is directed along the line connecting O and O'. Also, ##\vec{r}_{O'm}## should have magnitude ##r## since the mass is constrained to a circle about O'. Your vector's magnitude varies with time because of the cosine factor.

I'd suggest working in cartesian coordinates.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top