Radial probability distribution (rpd)

brainyman89
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Radial Probability Density = R(r) : Square of the Radial Wavefunction
The required volume is determined by the volume of the SPHERICAL SHELL enclosed between a sphere of radius (r+dr) and a sphere of radius r

rpd = radial probability density × volume of the spherical shell = R2 × 4πr2 drhow then did they cancel the dr and directly write:
rpd = R2 × 4πr2

??

also how could only radial probability be multiplied by volume? shouldn't the whole wave function be multiplied by the volume?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The density function is the derivative of the distribution - that's where the dr went.
 
mathman said:
The density function is the derivative of the distribution - that's where the dr went.

derivative with respect to what?
 
brainyman89 said:
derivative with respect to what?

The cumulative distribution is F(r) and the density function R(r) = dF(r)/dr
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top