Radial probability distribution (rpd)

brainyman89
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Radial Probability Density = R(r) : Square of the Radial Wavefunction
The required volume is determined by the volume of the SPHERICAL SHELL enclosed between a sphere of radius (r+dr) and a sphere of radius r

rpd = radial probability density × volume of the spherical shell = R2 × 4πr2 drhow then did they cancel the dr and directly write:
rpd = R2 × 4πr2

??

also how could only radial probability be multiplied by volume? shouldn't the whole wave function be multiplied by the volume?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The density function is the derivative of the distribution - that's where the dr went.
 
mathman said:
The density function is the derivative of the distribution - that's where the dr went.

derivative with respect to what?
 
brainyman89 said:
derivative with respect to what?

The cumulative distribution is F(r) and the density function R(r) = dF(r)/dr
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top