Radiation Exp: Converting μCi to dps & Understanding Half-Lives

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting the activity of radioactive sources (Ba-133, Cs-137, Co-60) from microcuries (μCi) to disintegrations per second (dps), noting that 1 μCi equals 3.7 x 10^4 dps. It highlights the confusion regarding why different isotopes with varying half-lives can have the same activity in dps, clarifying that they contain different numbers of radioactive atoms. The conversation also addresses estimating extra exposure in millirems (mR) during an experiment, suggesting that multiplying the measured dose rate by the time spent near the sources provides an upper limit for exposure. The participants emphasize safety, noting that the sources were handled in controlled conditions. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately assessing radiation exposure and shielding effectiveness.
Von Neumann
Messages
101
Reaction score
4
Question:

Recently I've conducted an experiment measuring the dose rate (in μR/h) from various samples (Ba-133, Cs-137, Co-60), at varying distances. In determining the efficiency of paper as a shield, it is required to convert the activity of the source to units of dinsintegrations/second (dps). On each of the sources was a label that stated the half-life. Additionally, each source said "1 μCi". So therefore, since 1 μCi = 3.7 x 10^4 dps, that would be the activity in dps. Correct? However, I don't understand how all of the sources could have the same activity in dps, but have different half-lives.

Note: the half-lives given on the sources for Ba-133, Cs-137, and Co-60 are 10.5, 30.2, and 5.27 years, respectively.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In determining the efficiency of paper as a shield, it is required to convert the activity of the source to units of dinsintegrations/second (dps).
Why? It should be sufficient to know the measured rate with and without shield.

However, I don't understand how all of the sources could have the same activity in dps, but have different half-lives.
Simple: they contain a different number of radioactive atoms.

Additionally, each source said "1 μCi". So therefore, since 1 μCi = 3.7 x 10^4 dps, that would be the activity in dps. Correct?
If the sources are new. Activity goes down with time, while the labels do not change.
 
Yes that does seem to be quite obvious, sorry.

Furthermore, I am looking to estimate my total extra exposure in mR (dose above background) due to performing the experiment by taking into account how long I was near each source, the strength of the source, and its approximate distance from me.

If I take my distance as 0 inches (since I was holding each source throughout experiment) and the time as roughly 10 minutes per source, how would I go about doing this? Perhaps, since I have the measured values of the dose rate at 0 inches from each source, could I multiply the dose rate by the amount of time in order to get this result?
 
That should give a reasonable upper limit on your dose rate. Even if you touched the radioactive part of the probe (I hope you did not), not all decay products have hit you.
 
Yes, I was holding the sources. However, I don't believe my professor would have the class conduct a lab that would endanger our health in any way. The sources were in specially prepared cases from Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top