Radiation Far Zone Expansion - 65 Characters

decerto
Messages
84
Reaction score
2
So using the lorenz gauge and maxwells equations we find that both the scalar and vector potentials obey the wave equation with a charge/current density source.

##\Box \phi= \frac{\rho}{\epsilon} ##
##\Box\vec{A} = \mu \vec{J}##

So using the greens function for the wave equation we can compute the scalar or vector potential given either a charge or current density.

##\phi(x,t)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\int \frac{\delta(t'-[t-\frac{|x-x'|}{c}])}{|x-x'|}\rho(x,t) dt'\ d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x,t)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\int \frac{\delta(t'-[t-\frac{|x-x'|}{c}])}{|x-x'|}\vec{J}(x,t) dt'\ d^3x'##

If the charge/current densities are sinusoidally time dependent and using the retarded condition from the greens function we get a spatially oscillating term in the integral solution for the potentials, this term can then be expanded in the 'far zone'.

##\rho(x,t)=\rho(x)e^{-i\omega t}##
##\vec{A}(x,t)=\vec{A}(x)e^{-i\omega t}##

##\phi(x,t)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\int \frac{\delta(t'-[t-\frac{|x-x'|}{c}])}{|x-x'|}\rho(x')e^{-i\omega t'} dt'\ d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x,t)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\int \frac{\delta(t'-[t-\frac{|x-x'|}{c}])}{|x-x'|}\vec{J}(x')e^{-i\omega t'}dt'\ d^3x'##

##\phi(x,t)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\int \frac{1}{|x-x'|}\rho(x')e^{-i\omega( t-\frac{|x-x'|}{c})} d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x,t)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\int \frac{1}{|x-x'|}\vec{J}(x')e^{-i\omega (t-\frac{|x-x'|}{c})} d^3x'##Making the time dependence implicit

##\phi(x)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\int \frac{e^{ik|x-x'|}}{|x-x'|}\rho(x') d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\int \frac{e^{ik|x-x'|}}{|x-x'|}\vec{J}(x') d^3x'##

Far zone ##|x-x'| \approx |x|-\frac{x \cdot x'}{|x|}=r-\hat{n}\cdot x'## for exponential and ##|x-x'|=|x|=r## for the denominator

##\phi(x)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\int e^{ik\hat{n}\cdot x'}\rho(x') d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\int e^{ik\hat{n}\cdot x'}\vec{J}(x') d^3x'##

##\phi(x)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(-ik)^n}{n!}\int (\hat{n} \cdot x')^n \rho(x') d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(-ik)^n}{n!}\int (\hat{n} \cdot x')^n \vec{J}(x') d^3x'##

My questions are about these expansions, for the scalar potential expansion the 1st term gives

##\phi(x)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\int \rho(x') d^3x'##

To me this looks like a monopole wave but jackson in section 9.1 for anyone who has the book explicitly states the monopole part of the the potential is necessarily static(spatially static) by considering ##|x-x'|=r##

##\phi(x,t)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\int \frac{\delta(t'-[t-\frac{r}{c}])}{r}\rho(x,t) dt'\ d^3x'##

##\phi(x,t)=\frac{q(t'=t-\frac{r}{c})}{4\pi \epsilon}##

I don't understand where this comes from and it appears to contradict the 1st term in the expansion.

My other question is about the the second term in the scalar expansion and the first term in the vector expansion given by ##\phi(x)=\frac{-ik}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\hat{n} \cdot \int x' \rho(x') d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\int\vec{J}(x') d^3x'##

By the continuity equation and integration by parts this can be shown to be

##\vec{A}(x)=-\frac{i\omega\mu}{4\pi}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\vec{p}##
##\phi(x)=-\frac{ik}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\hat{n} \cdot \vec{p}##

with ##\vec{p}=\int x' \rho(x') d^3x'##

So there is obviously a lot of symmetry between these two equations ##\omega## and ##k##, ##\vec{p}## and ##\hat{n} \cdot \vec{p}##, ##\mu## and ##\frac{1}{\epsilon}##

Is this symmetry perserved for all paired terms in both expansions like this, what do the higher order expansion terms look like and if I did this type of expansion in covariant notation would these be the part of the same term essentially?
 
  • Like
Likes MisterX
Physics news on Phys.org
decerto said:
My questions are about these expansions, for the scalar potential expansion the 1st term gives

##\phi(x)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\int \rho(x') d^3x'##

To me this looks like a monopole wave but jackson in section 9.1 for anyone who has the book explicitly states the monopole part of the the potential is necessarily static(spatially static) by considering ##|x-x'|=r##

##\phi(x,t)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\int \frac{\delta(t'-[t-\frac{r}{c}])}{r}\rho(x,t) dt'\ d^3x'##

##\phi(x,t)=\frac{q(t'=t-\frac{r}{c})}{4\pi \epsilon}##

I don't understand where this comes from and it appears to contradict the 1st term in the expansion.

There is indeed a ##1/r## missing in the text (http://www-theory.lbl.gov/jdj/Errata(2010).pdf). It does not change the discussion about the static nature, since that just refers to the time independence.

My other question is about the the second term in the scalar expansion and the first term in the vector expansion given by##\phi(x)=\frac{-ik}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\hat{n} \cdot \int x' \rho(x') d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\int\vec{J}(x') d^3x'##

By the continuity equation and integration by parts this can be shown to be

##\vec{A}(x)=-\frac{i\omega\mu}{4\pi}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\vec{p}##
##\phi(x)=-\frac{ik}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\hat{n} \cdot \vec{p}##

with ##\vec{p}=\int x' \rho(x') d^3x'##

So there is obviously a lot of symmetry between these two equations ##\omega## and ##k##, ##\vec{p}## and ##\hat{n} \cdot \vec{p}##, ##\mu## and ##\frac{1}{\epsilon}##

Is this symmetry perserved for all paired terms in both expansions like this, what do the higher order expansion terms look like and if I did this type of expansion in covariant notation would these be the part of the same term essentially?

The symmetry between the numerical coefficients is indeed a property of the Lorentz invariance of electrodynamics. The fact that both terms are dipoles is more a property of the multipole expansion of the Green function (9.98). The fact that the dipole comes in as the first term of the expansion of the vector potential vs the 2nd term for the scalar potential is due to the vector vs scalar nature of the objects. At higher orders, the structure is dictated by the polar symmetry of the spherical harmonics. I believe the quadropole moment is given somewhere in Ch 9. Some explicit forms for higher mulipole moments appears in http://zon8.physd.amu.edu.pl/historia/kielich-publ/129.pdf
 
What does the first term of the scalar expansion correspond to then?
 
decerto said:
What does the first term of the scalar expansion correspond to then?

It's the same static monopolar potential that you'd find if the charge configuration was static and spherically symmetric.
 
fzero said:
It's the same static monopolar potential that you'd find if the charge configuration was static and spherically symmetric.
But it has a spatially oscillating term ##e^{ikr}## and a temporal term ##e^{i\omega t}##?
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top