Radiation from a dielectric body

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of spectral density of radiation emitted by a semi-infinite dielectric body at temperature T, specifically focusing on the complexities introduced by anharmonic terms in the Hamiltonian. The participants highlight that while the dielectric function can be approximated by Lorentzian harmonic oscillators, a purely harmonic Hamiltonian would result in negligible emissivity. References to the solid state physics book by Ashcroft and Mermin are provided as a potential source for understanding anharmonic effects. The conversation emphasizes the need for a comprehensive treatment of this topic from first principles, which appears to be lacking in existing literature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bose-Einstein statistics
  • Familiarity with dielectric functions and their approximations
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian mechanics, particularly anharmonic terms
  • Basic principles of solid state physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of spectral density from first principles in solid state physics
  • Study the role of anharmonic terms in Hamiltonians and their impact on dielectric properties
  • Explore Kirchoff's law in the context of dielectric materials and their emissivity
  • Investigate literature on damped harmonic oscillators and their relation to absorption in dielectrics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and researchers interested in the thermal radiation properties of dielectric materials and their theoretical underpinnings.

Karthiksrao
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I needed help in finding a source where the derivation of radiation emitted by a dielectric body is laid out.

The derivation of spectral density of radiation emitted from a blackbody at a temperature ##T## is given in many books by populating the energy states using Bose-Einstein statistics. However, try as I might, I have not been able to find any source where the derivation of the spectral density of radiation emitted by a semi-infinite body with a dielectric function ##\varepsilon (\omega)## and at a temperature ##T## is derived from first-principles (populating the quantum states).

I'd assume it should be straightforward since the dielectric function can be approximated by Lorentzian harmonic oscillators. Is it not so ?

Do you know any book/paper which discusses this in detail ?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it takes more than a dielectric function and/or oscillators. It is necessary to have anharmonic terms (essentially non-linear in the restoring force or non-quadratic in the energy) in the Hamiltonian, which may give you a complex dielectric function (with imaginary components) and a complex index of refraction. A completely harmonic Hamiltonian would give you a completely transparent dielectric and thereby the emissivity would likely be near zero. I think the solid state physics book by Ashcroft and Mermin discusses the anharmonic Hamiltonian. I don't have any handy references that have the precise derivation you are looking for, but hopefully this is helpful.
 
I'm surprised why this topic of radiated energy density by a dielectric body is not commonly dealt with from first principles. I'd assume it to be of primary academic interest.
 
Regarding what you mentioned, won't damped harmonic oscillators account for absorption in the dielectric ?
 
Karthiksrao said:
Regarding what you mentioned, won't damped harmonic oscillators account for absorption in the dielectric ?
I think the two are mathematically quite similar, but you might find it written up in the solid state textbooks as an anharmonic term. Meanwhile, one other thing to consider would be a Kirckhoff's law type equation where for an opaque material the emissivity plus the reflectivity is equal to unity. For a dielectric, I think you have a similar relation with a transmission term included. I don't know of a good source that discusses this concept in depth, but hopefully you might find one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K