Radiation pressure - classical description

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the understanding of radiation pressure in relation to electromagnetic (e-m) waves and their interaction with matter. The original poster questions the conventional explanations, particularly regarding the phase relationships between the electric and magnetic fields and the resulting forces on electrons. They argue that the lateral forces experienced by electrons due to the magnetic field would average to zero over a cycle, suggesting that radiation pressure is not accurately predicted. Responses highlight that the Poynting vector analysis typically uses time-averaged values, which can overlook instantaneous phase interactions. The poster expresses a desire for a deeper understanding of the classical mechanisms involved in radiation pressure beyond the average calculations.
dan_b_
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have a question about the e-m explanation of radiation pressure.
As I understand it, when an e-m wave with low frequency strikes a material with a much higher resonance frequency, the displacement of the electron relative to the atom will be in phase with the electric field (well opposite phase if you account for the negative charge).
When the electric field incident on an atom is at the maximum value of the wave cycle
(ie. E(t) = Eo=Emax) , the velocity of the vibrating electron would be zero (at a turning point). The magnetic field, though also a maximum at this time (t), would produce no force on the electron at this moment.

If one explores the force produced by the magnetic field on the electron a small time before time t (e.g. 10% of a cycle earlier, when the vibrating electron is in motion) one finds that the electron (say moving in the +y direction) will experience a lateral force, say in the direction of the incident radiation. But if one compares this to the force experienced a short moment after time t (e.g. 10% of a cycle later) the electron is moving in the opposite direction (having passed the turning point). The B field still has the same sign at this moment, but the electron's velocity has reversed - the lateral force produced by the B-field must also be reversed. As I see it, radiation pressure is not predicted - the lateral force on the matter would be oscillatory. The lateral force produced would average to zero over a cycle.

I have read Poyting vector analyses that generate the radiation pressure, but they never seem to discuss the instantaneous relationships of the phases of interest.

Is there something wrong with my thinking? Is there an article that accounts for the phase
relations in the radiation pressure analysis? I would be most grateful if I could get the help to "get over this one"!
 
Science news on Phys.org
dan_b_ said:
I have read Poyting vector analyses that generate the radiation pressure, but they never seem to discuss the instantaneous relationships of the phases of interest.

That's because it is usually the time averaged Poynting vector that is used to find radiation pressure.

Is there something wrong with my thinking? Is there an article that accounts for the phase
relations in the radiation pressure analysis? "!

Yes there is, but I'm too lazy to LaTex it; It is given here (middle of the page under the heading "DERIVATION"):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poynting_vector

Creator
 
I had a look at the Poynting vector information that you recommended - thank you for the suggestion. It seems like Poynting vector arguments justifiably ignore the nature of the interaction of the wave and matter, in that conservation of E and p are sufficient to predict a formula for the amount of radiation pressure that an e-m wave can exert on matter. This would justify the time averaging approach. But I am still interested in understanding the classical mechanism of the interaction (the meat rather than the potatoes, if you will).
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Back
Top