Radicals Do they always have a +/- in front of them?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lLovePhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radicals
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of radicals, specifically whether they always include a ± sign. Participants explore the implications of taking square roots in equations and the distinction between functions defined by radicals and solutions to equations involving squares.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question when the ± sign is necessary, particularly in the context of solving equations versus defining functions. They discuss the nature of the function y=√x and whether it should always be considered positive.

Discussion Status

There is a range of perspectives on the role of the ± sign in relation to radicals. Some participants clarify that y=√x is conventionally the positive root, while others emphasize the importance of context in determining when the ± sign is applicable. The discussion is ongoing with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that y=√x is defined as the positive root, while y=±√x represents both roots of an equation. There is also mention of the implications of defining functions and the conditions under which the ± sign is introduced.

lLovePhysics
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
Do radicals always have a +/- sign in front of them?

For example the equation: [tex]y=\sqrt{x}[/tex]

Is that only a half of a sleeping parabola or is it a full one?

Does a radical only have a +/- sign in front of it when it takes this form?:

[tex]y^{2}=x \rightarrow y=\pm \sqrt{x}[/tex]


So, is there a rule that when you square root something the +/- sign always goes in front of it? If you do not square root something, the square rooted term is only positive and does not contain the +/- sign?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The ± pops up when you have an equation with an unknown squared on one side and you want to solve for that unknown. Then you take the square root of both sides and the ± pops up because if we have for instance y² = 9, then both y=3 and y=-3 are solutions. So we write [itex]y^2=x \ \Leftrightarrow \ y=\pm \sqrt{x}[/itex] to illustrate that fact.

If you have the function [itex]y=\sqrt{x}[/itex], then this is quite different from what I talk about above. It is an equation that simply tells you "given a number x in the domain of definition of the function y, associate to it the number [itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex]".
 
quasar987 said:
The ± pops up when you have an equation with an unknown squared on one side and you want to solve for that unknown. Then you take the square root of both sides and the ± pops up because if we have for instance y² = 9, then both y=3 and y=-3 are solutions. So we write [itex]y^2=x \ \Leftrightarrow \ y=\pm \sqrt{x}[/itex] to illustrate that fact.

If you have the function [itex]y=\sqrt{x}[/itex], then this is quite different from what I talk about above. It is an equation that simply tells you "given a number x in the domain of definition of the function y, associate to it the number [itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex]".

So if you are given the equation [tex]y=\sqrt{x}[/tex], but it doesn't tell you that it is a function should you always assume that it is a function and that the sign in front of the radical is positive?

What if it tells you to test whehter [tex]y=\sqrt{x}[/tex] is a function? Should you still assume that it is always a function? and always positive?
 
there is nothing to assume regarding the sign in front of the radical in [tex]y=\sqrt{x}[/tex]: [tex]\sqrt{x}=+\sqrt{x}[/tex].
 
[itex]y= \sqrt{x}[/itex] is, by definition, the positive root. That's why you need the [itex]\pm[/itex] in front of a radical in the solution of an equation. The complete solution to x2= 3 is [itex]x=\pm \sqrt{3}[/itex]. If you only wrote [itex]x= \sqrt{3}[/itex] you would be missing the negative root. Yes, the graph of [itex]y= \sqrt{x}[/itex] is the upper half of a parabola with horizontal axis. Notice that x= y2 would not define y as a function of x.
 
lLovePhysics said:
Is that only a half of a sleeping parabola or is it a full one?

That is so Cute! (Stop looking at me like that).

You had the right answer in your post :) (Although your arrow could point both ways, it still works in reverse)

[tex]y^{2}=x \rightarrow y=\pm \sqrt{x}[/tex]

But when [tex]y=\sqrt{x}[/tex] we always take the positive root, its convention.
 
[tex]y=\sqrt{x}[/tex]

is a different function than

[tex]y=\pm\sqrt{x}[/tex]
or do I mean [tex]y=\-sqrt{x}[/tex]. having trouble using LaTex here.
I'm trying to say y=-(x)^(0.5)
 
[itex]y= \sqrt{x}[/itex] is a "function" while "[itex]y= \pm\sqrt{x}[/itex] is not a function. If you meant [itex]y= -\sqrt{x}[/itex], yes, that is a different function from [itex]y= \sqrt{x}[/itex], just as y= -x is different from y= x.
 
You add +/- if you yourself added the radical to the problem. Take your example:

[tex]y^2 = x[/tex]

"y" could be both positive or negative since it is being squared right? We account for this by adding +/-.

Don't confuse this with a function that is defined with a radical such as:

[tex]y = \sqrt{x}[/tex]

Where x can only be positive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K