Radii of Bright Fringes in Reflected Light for Plano-Convex Lens

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the radii of the first and second bright fringes in reflected light from a plano-convex lens with a radius of curvature of 2.6 m, illuminated by monochromatic light of 565-nm wavelength. The correct method involves using the formula t = 1/4 λ for constructive interference to determine the first bright fringe radius, which was calculated as 8.5703e-4 m. To find the second bright fringe, participants are advised to derive the thickness expression for it, rather than attempting to calculate the first dark fringe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of plano-convex lens optics
  • Knowledge of interference patterns in reflected light
  • Familiarity with the wavelength of light and its impact on optical calculations
  • Proficiency in applying formulas for constructive and destructive interference
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive thickness expressions for multiple bright fringes in optical interference
  • Study the principles of constructive and destructive interference in thin films
  • Explore the application of the lens maker's equation for plano-convex lenses
  • Investigate the effects of varying wavelengths on fringe spacing in optical setups
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics educators, and professionals involved in optical engineering or lens design will benefit from this discussion.

snoweangel27
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A plano-convex glass lens of radius of curvature 2.6 m rests on an optically flat glass plate. The arrangement is illuminated from above with monochromatic light of 565-nm wavelength. The indexes of refraction of the lens and plate are 1.6. Determine the radii of the first and second bright fringes in the reflected light.


Homework Equations


t=1/4 lamda
x = [tex]\sqrt{2tR}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the first fringe to be 8.5703e-4m. I thought that I would be able to calculate the first dark spot using t= 1/2 lamda and subtract the two to obtain the difference. However, I am not getting the right answer. Does anyone know if this is the correct method and equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi snoweangel27,

The formula you have (t=(1/4) lambda) arises from finding the minimum thickness giving constructive interference, and it looks like you correctly found the radius corresponding to this first bright fringe.

There's no need to find the first dark fringe (although your equation t= 1/2 lambda is correct for that). Instead, find the thickness expression for the second bright fringe, and then find its radius the same way you did for the first bright fringe.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K