Radio Wave Speed: Reduce Source Transmission?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of reducing the speed of radio waves at their source, particularly in the context of transmitting through air. Participants explore various mediums, the effects of obstacles, and the nature of signal transmission.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about methods to reduce radio wave speed at the transmitter, suggesting a desire for a simple solution.
  • Another participant states that without a dispersive medium or waveguide, it is not possible to reduce the speed of radio waves.
  • A participant explains that ordinary dispersive mediums include materials like water and glass.
  • There is mention of ongoing research into slowing light in anomalous dispersive mediums, but it is noted that signals revert to normal speeds in air or vacuum.
  • A suggestion is made about using a delay circuit in the transmitter, questioning whether the goal is to slow the signal or simply delay its arrival.
  • One participant proposes designing a signaling standard based on phase velocity, which could allow for slower transmission of information while signals still propagate at the speed of light.
  • A question is raised about the average velocity reduction of radio waves in urban environments and whether this effect is frequency dependent.
  • It is clarified that sending radio waves through a city still means they travel through air, and while buildings can block or reflect signals, they do not slow them down.
  • Participants discuss the implications of reflections and longer path lengths on signal timing, noting that while the speed remains constant, the time taken can increase due to longer paths.
  • An example is provided regarding analog television and the phenomenon of "ghosts," which occur due to reflected signals taking longer paths to reach the antenna.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that radio waves travel at a constant speed in air and that obstacles can affect signal paths but not speed. However, there are competing views on the feasibility of reducing wave speed at the source and the implications of using different mediums.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the physics involved, and some assumptions about the nature of mediums and signal transmission remain unaddressed.

mixy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
first HI to everyone!

I have a question:

is there a (simple) way to reduce radio wave speed at it's source - transmitor (e.g. to 100 or 1000x less then the speed of light)?

thx in advance
 
Science news on Phys.org
Unless you are transmitting it in an ordinary dispersive medium, or a waveguide, no.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Unless you are transmitting it in an ordinary dispersive medium, or a waveguide, no.


sorry but I have only basic phsycs knowledge. So ... what is an ordinary dispersive medium?

thx
 
Example: water, glass, etc.

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But again, those require a medium. The NEC experiment from a few years ago requires an "anomalous" dispersive medium. Things will still go back to normal if the signal goes back into air/vacuum.

So unless one is willing to live in water or in those medium, there's nothing one can do to change the speed of light.

Zz.
 
Hi, Mixy.
I don't suppose that simply introducing a delay circuit into the transmitter would simulate the effect enough for your purposes? What I mean is, do you actually want the signal to go slower, or just get there later?
 
Thx for the help.

Danger: no, just interested in actually slowing it down (travelling thru air)
 
You can design a signalling standard based on phase velocity instead of group velocity. Then you can accomplish arbitrarily slow transmission of information, even though the actual signals propagate at c.

- Warren
 
  • #10
Is there an estimation on how much velocity is reduced (average) in using radio waves in cities or populated regions (trees, hills, houses, etc.) ?

Is this frequency dependent?

thx
Miha
 
  • #11
Sending radio through a city is still just sending it through air. A building can block or reflect radio, but won't slow it down.
 
  • #12
russ_watters said:
Sending radio through a city is still just sending it through air. A building can block or reflect radio, but won't slow it down.

so, a radio wave would travel the distance from point A to point B in constant time T, no matter what stands between this two points (buildings, trees ...) ?
 
  • #13
Pretty much, yes. You can get reflections which can mean that the same signal can take different paths to reach the same point, but the speed is the same.
 
  • #14
Integral said:
Pretty much, yes. You can get reflections which can mean that the same signal can take different paths to reach the same point, but the speed is the same.

but wouldn't it take longer then - if the signal takes different paths (consider measuring time T in nano or piko seconds)?
 
  • #15
Takes longer because the path length is longer, the speed stays the same.
 
  • #16
In analog television received over the air with an antenna, this is what causes "ghosts:" faint secondary images that are shifted slightly to one side of the main image on the TV screen. Reflected signals from a large nearby object (building, water tower, etc.) take slightly longer to reach the antenna because they have to travel a longer path.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K