Radioactive Emissions Basics - Check Answers & Clear Signs

AI Thread Summary
Radioactive emissions basics were discussed, focusing on gamma emissions and neutrons. Gamma emissions are confirmed to be chargeless and massless, while neutrons have a relative mass of one and no charge. The participant expressed skepticism about the accuracy of their textbook answers, which seemed to contradict this understanding. It was suggested that the textbook is likely correct, but the participant plans to consult their teacher for clarification. This highlights the importance of verifying information in educational materials.
_Mayday_
Messages
808
Reaction score
0
I've just been working on some of the basics of radioactive emissions. I checked my answers in the back of the book and was so supried at what I found. I just want to clear some of these signs. charges and and relative mass.

Gamma ^1_1\gamma

Neutron^1_1n

I thought that gamma emission had no charge or relative mass. I also thought that the neutron had a relative mass of one, but no charge...

Is the answer book incorrect? Or do I just not trust it enough?

Thanks :cool:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I'm aware, you're correct, the book is not.
 
Could you source that?
 
Uh... not off the top of my head. Gamma is electromagnetic radiation, and is therefore massless and chargeless. Neutrons are almost equivalent in mass to protons (with negligible difference), and therefore have mass 1, and (as the name suggests) electrically neutral, thus no charge.
 
You see that is exactly what I thought, but it's not very common for a textbook to be wrong after many students before me would have used it, and it's hard to believe it would not have been spotted. Thank you.
 
I will consult my teacher
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top