Radionuclides of radon and thoron

  • Thread starter Thread starter hariprasath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radon
AI Thread Summary
Bq/m3 measures radioactivity per unit volume, while Bq/kg indicates radioactivity per unit mass. Bq/kg/h represents the rate of specific activity change over time, factoring in decay and mass transport. The exhalation rate of radon and thoron from sediments can indeed be expressed in Bq/kg/h. Understanding these units is crucial for accurately assessing radioactivity and its implications in various contexts.
hariprasath
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
what is the difference between Bq/m3 and Bq/Kg/h. can the exhaltion rate of radon and thoron for the sediments can can be in the units of Bq/Kg/h.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Becquerel = 1 decay/second (1/s, or s-1), so it is a measure of activity.

Bq/m3 is activity per unit volume (in SI). Bq/kg would be activity per unit mass (in SI or mks).

The term Bq/Kg/h is specific activity per time in decays/s/kg/h, so it represents the rate at which the specific activity is changing, which could happen due to decay (or transmutation) of the nuclide and due to mass transport (exhalation or excretion in a person) into or out of the control volume.

Activity is given by the product of the decay constant and the number of atoms of a given nuclide.
 
thank you sir
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top