Radius of a lead nucleus and alpha particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the radius of a lead nucleus and an alpha particle, as well as determining the kinetic energy required for alpha particles to interact with a lead nucleus. The approximate radius of the lead nucleus is calculated to be 5.91 x 10^-15 m, while the radius of the alpha particle is found to be 1.59 x 10^-15 m. Participants clarify that simply multiplying the number of nucleons by the radius of a single nucleon does not accurately represent the nucleus's structure. The kinetic energy needed for alpha particles to overcome the repulsive force between protons is derived using electrostatic potential energy equations, resulting in a value of approximately 31.48 MeV. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the forces at play in nuclear interactions.
Oribe Yasuna
Messages
43
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A lead nucleus contains 207 nucleons (82 protons and 125 neutrons) packed tightly against each other. A single nucleon (proton or neutron) has a radius of about 1 ✕ 10^−15 m.

(a) Calculate the approximate radius of the lead nucleus.

(b) Calculate the approximate radius of the alpha particle, which consists of 4 nucleons, 2 protons and 2 neutrons.

(c) What kinetic energy must alpha particles have in order to make contact with a lead nucleus?

Homework Equations


v_sphere = 4/3 pi r^3
r_nucleon = 1 * 10 ^ -15 m

The Attempt at a Solution


207 * 1 * 10 ^ -15 m
2.07 * 10 ^ -13 m

Beyond this, I don't have any idea what to do.
I considered using d = m/v, but stopped halfway because I was approaching a bizarre answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oribe Yasuna said:
207 * 1 * 10 ^ -15 m
That would be the approximate length of a chain of 207 nucleons, spaced one radius apart each. That's not how a lead nucleus looks like. Where does that multiplication come from?

Oribe Yasuna said:
I considered using d = m/v, but stopped halfway because I was approaching a bizarre answer.
What are d, m and v?
Did you try conservation of energy?
 
mfb said:
That would be the approximate length of a chain of 207 nucleons, spaced one radius apart each. That's not how a lead nucleus looks like. Where does that multiplication come from?
I figured the radius of a single proton/neutron is 1* 10 ^ -15 so the radius of the nucleus, which consists of 207 protons and neutrons, would be 207 multiplied by 1 * 10 ^ -15 m.

Since 207 doesn't have any units, dimensional analysis checked at least.

mfb said:
What are d, m and v?
Did you try conservation of energy?
Density, mass and volume.
I thought of doing that because I could calculate the mass and volume, but of course density doesn't seem to have anything to do with the problem.

I didn't try the Law of Conservation of Energy (m_1 v_1 = m_2 v_2).
But I don't get how it would help? Doesn't it need at least 1 velocity vector? I only have volume, radius, and potentially mass.

Sorry for the late reply.
 
Oribe Yasuna said:
I figured the radius of a single proton/neutron is 1* 10 ^ -15 so the radius of the nucleus, which consists of 207 protons and neutrons, would be 207 multiplied by 1 * 10 ^ -15 m.
If I arrange 27 identical cubes of side 1cm into one large cube, how long is each side of the large cube?
 
haruspex said:
If I arrange 27 identical cubes of side 1cm into one large cube, how long is each side of the large cube?
3cm.
 
Oribe Yasuna said:
3cm.
Right. Not 27cm. So why would a cluster of 207 spheres each of radius 1* 10 ^ -15m have a radius of 207 times that?
 
So if the number (the volume) increases by a factor of 3, the 'length' increases by a factor of 3.
Now a bulging stuffed bag with 207 oranges. what's the approximate raduis in units of one orange radius ?
[edit] ah, Haru is back. Sorry for barging in ! Bedtime :sleep:.
 
haruspex said:
Right. Not 27cm. So why would a cluster of 207 spheres each of radius 1* 10 ^ -15m have a radius of 207 times that?
They wouldn't.

So I took the cubed root of 207 (5.9154817) and multiplied it by 1*10^-15 m.
The answer I got was 5.915*10^-15 m and it was correct.

For part b)
I figured a cube of 4 smaller cubes would have sides of size 2. So I multiplied 5.9154817*10^-15 m by 2 to get 1.18*10^-14 m.
But the answer was wrong. Why? Is it just because I didn't put a fourth significant figure, maybe?
 
Oribe Yasuna said:
They wouldn't.

So I took the cubed root of 207 (5.9154817) and multiplied it by 1*10^-15 m.
The answer I got was 5.915*10^-15 m and it was correct.

For part b)
I figured a cube of 4 smaller cubes would have sides of size 2. So I multiplied 5.9154817*10^-15 m by 2 to get 1.18*10^-14 m.
But the answer was wrong. Why? Is it just because I didn't put a fourth significant figure, maybe?
I don't know why I multiplied by 2.

4^1/3 * 1*10^-15 m = 1.59*10^-15 m
which was the answer for part b).
 
  • #10
Oribe Yasuna said:
(c) What kinetic energy must alpha particles have in order to make contact with a lead nucleus?
I don't understand how to get part c).

This is what I know:
r_lead = 5.91*10^-15 m
r_alpha = 1.59*10^-15 m
v = 4/3 pi r^3
K = 1/2 mv^2
1.6*10^-19 J = 1 eV
1 eV = 1*10^-6 MeV
m_proton = 1.6726219*10^-27
m_neutron = 1.6749*10^-24

I calculated v_sphere for the lead nucleus and alpha particle:
v_lead = 8.670795724*10^-43 m^3
v_alpha = 1.675516082*10^-44 m^3

I don't know where to go with this though.
 
  • #11
Oribe Yasuna said:
I don't understand how to get part c).

This is what I know:
r_lead = 5.91*10^-15 m
r_alpha = 1.59*10^-15 m
v = 4/3 pi r^3
K = 1/2 mv^2
1.6*10^-19 J = 1 eV
1 eV = 1*10^-6 MeV
m_proton = 1.6726219*10^-27
m_neutron = 1.6749*10^-24

I calculated v_sphere for the lead nucleus and alpha particle:
v_lead = 8.670795724*10^-43 m^3
v_alpha = 1.675516082*10^-44 m^3

I don't know where to go with this though.
Think about this: what makes it hard for the alpha particle to hit the nucleus?
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
Think about this: what makes it hard for the alpha particle to hit the nucleus?
Its size?
 
  • #13
Oribe Yasuna said:
Its size?
I suppose that is one problem. But why should any particular energy be required? Why couldn't they just drift slowly together?
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
I suppose that is one problem. But why should any particular energy be required? Why couldn't they just drift slowly together?
Because protons repel each other and they're both made of protons, right?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Oribe Yasuna said:
Because protons repel each other and they're both made of protons, right?
Right. So how does that lead to a specific energy requirement?
 
  • #16
haruspex said:
Right. So how does that lead to a specific energy requirement?
You need enough kinetic energy to move against that repellent force.

So kinetic energy would be equal to the force that the protons repel each other with.
Would that be electrical potential energy?
 
  • #17
Oribe Yasuna said:
You need enough kinetic energy to move against that repellent force.

So kinetic energy would be equal to the force that the protons repel each other with.
Would that be electrical potential energy?
Yes. Do you know any equations for that?
 
  • #18
haruspex said:
Yes. Do you know any equations for that?
U = 1/(4 pi E_knot) * (q_1 q_2) / r

1/ 4 pi E_knot = 9 * 10^9 Nm^2 / c^2
r = 5.92*10^-15 + 1.58*10^-15 = 7.50*10^-15

I don't know what q_1 and q_2 are though? Something to do with v_sphere?
 
  • #19
Oribe Yasuna said:
U = 1/(4 pi E_knot) * (q_1 q_2) / r

1/ 4 pi E_knot = 9 * 10^9 Nm^2 / c^2
r = 5.92*10^-15 + 1.58*10^-15 = 7.50*10^-15

I don't know what q_1 and q_2 are though? Something to do with v_sphere?
They're the charges. Look up the charge of a proton and count the protons in each.
 
  • #20
haruspex said:
They're the charges. Look up the charge of a proton and count the protons in each.
q_1 = 82 * 1.6*10^-19 = 1.312*10^-17
q_2 = 2 * 1.6*10^-19 = 3.2*10^-19

U = 9*10^9 * (1.312*10^-17 * 3.2*10^-19) / 7.50*10^-15
U = 9*10^9 * 4.1984*10^-36 / 7.50*10^-15
U = 5.036144273*10^-12 J

1 eV = 1.6*10^-19 J

5.036144273*10^-12 / 1.6*10^-19 = 3.147590171*10^7 eV

1 MeV = 1*10^6 eV

3.14*10^7 / 1*10^6 = 31.48 MeV

It was correct!
Thanks a ton, I appreciate it.
 
  • #21
Oribe Yasuna said:
q_1 = 82 * 1.6*10^-19 = 1.312*10^-17
q_2 = 2 * 1.6*10^-19 = 3.2*10^-19

U = 9*10^9 * (1.312*10^-17 * 3.2*10^-19) / 7.50*10^-15
U = 9*10^9 * 4.1984*10^-36 / 7.50*10^-15
U = 5.036144273*10^-12 J

1 eV = 1.6*10^-19 J

5.036144273*10^-12 / 1.6*10^-19 = 3.147590171*10^7 eV

1 MeV = 1*10^6 eV

3.14*10^7 / 1*10^6 = 31.48 MeV

It was correct!
Thanks a ton, I appreciate it.
You are welcome.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
Back
Top