Radius of Curvature of a Train Turning North East

  • Thread starter Thread starter harini_5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature Radius
AI Thread Summary
When a train turns from north to northeast, the outer rail's radius of curvature is greater than that of the inner rail due to the geometry of the track. The inner and outer rails are both circular, but the outer rail's radius exceeds the inner rail's by the width of the train. The discussion emphasizes that the equations for centripetal acceleration apply to point masses, while a train should be considered as a non-point mass, focusing on its center of mass. The velocity and radial acceleration remain consistent across both rails, but the curvature differences arise from their respective radii. Understanding these principles clarifies the dynamics of train movement on curved tracks.
harini_5
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
A train is moving towards north at one place.
it turns towards north east.
here we observe that the radius of curvature of outer rail will be greater than that of inner rail
why?pls explain
velocity and radial acc. are the same and radius of curvature=v^2/a normal
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are focusing too much on the equations here...

if you consider a train going about a circular track, the inner and outer rail of the track will both be circular, but the outer rail will have a radius greater than the inner rail by the width of the train.

this is all this statement is saying.

in the equation for centripetal accelleration the radius is assuming a point particle, which a train is not.

the same equation is true for a non-point-mass where the radius is then for the center of mass.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top