Radius of the path of an accelerating object in uniform Circular motion

AI Thread Summary
A 2 kg car is moving in a flat circle with a velocity of 24 m/s West and a total acceleration of 9 m/s² at 53 degrees North of West. The problem requires determining the radius of the circular path without using calculus, as the focus is on the relationship between acceleration and radius. The total acceleration's angle indicates that the car is not moving at a right angle to its acceleration, confirming it is in circular motion. The radial acceleration can be calculated using the formula for centripetal acceleration, allowing for the radius to be derived from the given values. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the components of acceleration in circular motion to solve the problem effectively.
Runaway
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2 kg car travels in a flat circle. At
a certain instant the velocity of the car is
24 m/s West and the total acceleration of the
car is 9 m/s
2
at 53 degrees
North of West.

What is its radius?
Answer in units of km.


Homework Equations


F=ma
w=(2pi)/T
a= w^2 r
v=wr


The Attempt at a Solution


I have no Idea where to start. But, I do know that it is accelerating because its velocity is not at a right angle to its total acceleration.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Runaway! :smile:

(have a pi: π and an omega: ω and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
Runaway said:
… I do know that it is accelerating because its velocity is not at a right angle to its total acceleration.

if it's moving in a circle with speed v, its components of acceleration are mv2/r radially inward, and dv/dt tangentially forward :wink:
 
I don't follow, what equation am I supposed to take the derivative of, and when I do, won't I end up with a equation in terms of t, which isn't stated?
I'm in an algebra and trig. based physics class, so we haven't really used calculus, but I am in a calculus class right now, and we are learning how to take implicit derivatives. So I think I can handle doing the derivative, if there isn't another way to solve the problem.
 
Hi Runaway! :wink:

You don't have to differentiate or integrate anything, the question doesn't ask you for v, it only asks for the radius.

You know the total acceleration is at 37° to the radius, so call the radius r and find two different equations for the radial (centripetal) acceleration. :smile:
 
Thanks for your help Tim, I only read your post at a glance and saw dv/dt, which made me think that I had to use that to find the answer, but now I figured it out.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top